It's the dumbest thing for a culture to do to itself. I'm often so incredulous I want to believe it was actually done by soviet-bloc propaganda to undermine the west.

Hard agree! Although I'm biased as a foreign language teacher :)

Geography is a great example actually because it can be "factoid based" or it could be based on investigation. Off the top of my head, students could make rivers through sandpits to investigate erosion. Hopefully AI inspires a change to the latter approach.

I often see people online saying "We were never taught this in school!" as if the point in education is to memorize all the factoids. But we should be teaching people how to do experiments, look things up and apply critical thinking.

car + stupid = idiot, car + idiot = stupid

Maybe the new frontier of SEO is gaming LLMs to recommend your product.

Personally, I am constantly amused in 2025 how much Vietnam loves asthetics like Frutiger Aero[1]. For example [2].

I only see the style from OP sold to tourists or on government billboards, and even then I see vector waves sneaking in too.

1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frutiger_Aero 2: https://appro.com.vn/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/bang-quang-c...

    rock vs paper = paper vs rock

    (rock vs paper) vs scissors != rock vs (paper vs scissors)

I frequently use what OP refers to as chat-driven programming, and I find it incredibly useful. My process starts by explaining a minimum viable product to the chat, which then generates the code for me. Sometimes, the code requires a bit of manual tweaking, but it’s usually a solid starting point. From there, I describe each new feature I want to add—often pasting in specific functions for the chat to modify or expand.

This approach significantly boosts what I can get done in one coding session. I can take an idea and turn it into something functional on the same day. It allows me to quickly test all my ideas, and if one doesn’t help as expected, I haven’t wasted much time or effort.

The biggest downside, however, is the rapid accumulation of technical debt. The code can get messy quickly. There's often a lot of redundancy and after a few iterations it can be quite daunting to modify.

Now, in the UK students sit 2 different exams: one where calculators are forbidden and one where calculators are permitted (and encouraged). The problems for the calculator exam are chosen so that the candidate must do a lot of problem solving that isn't just computation. Furthermore, putting a problem into a calculator and then double checking the answer is a skill in itself that is taught.

I think the same sort of solution will be needed across the board now - where students learn to think for themselves without the technology but also learn to correctly use the technology to solve the right kinds of challenges and have the skills to check the answers.

People on HN often talk about ai detection or putting invisible text in the instructions to detect copy and pasting. I think this is a fundamentally wrong approach. We need to work with, not against the technology - the genie is out of the bottle now.

As an example of a non-chatgpt way to evaluate students, teachers can choose topics chatgpt fails at. I do a lot of writing on niche topics and there are plenty of topics out there where chatgpt has no clue and spits out pure fabrications. Teachers can play around to find a topic where chatgpt performs poorly.

I teach ESL in Vietnam. The above quote boggles my mind. I've taught disadvantaged rural students and urban students with educated parents. Of course I tried my absolute best for the rural students, I worked a lot harder for them than for the privileged students. However, it would be madness to hamstring the students who happen to be privileged. Holding the whole country to the lowest common denominator doesn't benefit the country at all.

I thought Vietnam was very Confucian and uniform but Japan seems even more extreme. Maybe Vietnam also applies Marx's doctrine of "From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs" to offset it.

Thanks for your great write up on this topic. This was a very interesting read for me.

I'd love to see research into if self-reported aphantasia correlates to depression or anxiety.