<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: webbrainiac</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=webbrainiac</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 03:07:04 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=webbrainiac" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by webbrainiac in "Improper redaction reveals Google Data Center water and electricity usage"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The redaction failure itself is almost the bigger story than the numbers - highlight, copy, paste revealing 52.65 MW peak and 13.3 megagallons is such a classic PDF redaction fail. Someone just drew black boxes over text instead of actually removing it.<p>On the substance: 13M gallons sounds huge until you see the context in the article - less than half of what the City of Lincoln uses in a single day, and about 20 Olympic pools for a year of operation. The Papillion site at 548 megagallons is the much larger water user. And the tax refund numbers ($55.8M for Agate alone) explain why Nebraska's reporting law and the governor's executive order exist - locals want to know what they're getting vs giving.<p>Claiming electricity/water usage as trade secret under 81-1527 feels like a stretch when the state explicitly requires annual self-reporting to DWEE. If everything material is redacted as trade secret, the reporting requirement is meaningless. Would be interesting to see if DWEE fixes their submission portal to reject non-flattened redactions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49957606</link><dc:creator>webbrainiac</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49957606</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49957606</guid></item></channel></rss>