<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: weisnobody</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=weisnobody</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=weisnobody" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by weisnobody in "World Happiness Report 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, someone once tried to get happiness classified as a psychiatric disorder:<p>* <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1376114/" rel="nofollow">https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1376114/</a> (1992)<p>The abstract: “ It is proposed that happiness be classified as a psychiatric disorder and be included in future editions of the major diagnostic manuals under the new name: major affective disorder, pleasant type. In a review of the relevant literature it is shown that happiness is statistically abnormal, consists of a discrete cluster of symptoms, is associated with a range of cognitive abnormalities, and probably reflects the abnormal functioning of the central nervous system. One possible objection to this proposal remains--that happiness is not negatively valued. However, this objection is dismissed as scientifically irrelevant.”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 18:32:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47443800</link><dc:creator>weisnobody</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47443800</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47443800</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by weisnobody in "After two years of vibecoding, I'm back to writing by hand [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Using AI for coding (or anything) is like being a manager.  Successes get passed on to the team (with some to the manager) but the blame stops at the manager</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 17:18:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46745432</link><dc:creator>weisnobody</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46745432</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46745432</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by weisnobody in "Waiting for dawn in search: Search index, Google rulings and impact on Kagi"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes the stats don't make sense.  It appears to be an issue with StatsCounter.<p>The Search Engine wikipedia article [1] has a section on Russia and East Asia market share, which confirms that the roll up used for world wide counts is off, unless the number of people using the Internet is drastically different in some of the countries.<p>Russia<p><pre><code>  * Yandex: 70.7%
  * Google: 23.3%
</code></pre>
China:<p><pre><code>  * Baidu: 59.3%
  * Other domestic engines: "smaller shares"
  * Bing: 13.6%
</code></pre>
South Korea:<p><pre><code>  * Naver: 59.8%
  * Google: 35.4%
</code></pre>
Japan:
  * Google: 76.2%
  * Yahoo! Japan: 15.8%<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine#Market_share" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine#Market_share</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 19:51:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710660</link><dc:creator>weisnobody</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710660</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710660</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by weisnobody in "Waiting for dawn in search: Search index, Google rulings and impact on Kagi"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the crawled data should have to be shared, but I'm not convinced that Google should have to share their index.<p>It may be impracticable to share the crawled data, but from the stand point of content providers, having a single entity collecting the information (rather than a bunch of people doing) would seem to be better for everyone.  Likely need to have some form of robots.txt which would allow the content provider to indicate how their content could be used (i.e research, web search, AI, etc.).<p>The people accessing the crawled data would end up paying (reasonable) fees to access the level of data they want, and some portion of that fee would go to the content provider (30% to the crawler and 70% to the crawler? :P maybe).<p>Maybe even go so far as to allow the Paywalled content providers to set a price on accessing their data for the different purposes.  Should they be allowed to pick and choose who within those types should be allowed (or have it be based on violations of the terms of access)<p>It seems in part the content providers have the following complaints:<p><pre><code>  * Too many crawlers (see note below re crawlers)
  * Crawlers not being friendly
  * Improper use of the crawled data
  * Not getting compensated for their content

</code></pre>
Why not the index?  The index, to me, is where a bunch of the "magic" happens and where individual companies could differentiate themselves from everyone else.<p>Why can't Microsoft retain Bing traffic when it's the default on stock Windows installs?<p><pre><code>  * Do they not have enough crawled data?  
  * Their index isn't very good?
  * Their searching their index isn't good
  * The way they present the data is bad?
  * Google is too entrenched?
  * Combination of the above?

</code></pre>
There are several entities intending to crawl all / large portions of the Internet: Baidu, Bing, Brave, Google, DuckDuckGo, Gigablast, Mojeek, Sogou and Yandex [1].  That does not include any of the smaller entities, research projects, etc.<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine#2000s–present:_Post_dot-com_bubble" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine#2000s–present:_P...</a> (2019)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 19:38:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710467</link><dc:creator>weisnobody</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710467</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710467</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by weisnobody in "American workers' enthusiasm for their jobs falls to a 10-year low"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Grass!  You have grass on your side?<p>Lucky you. :P</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:06:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42698967</link><dc:creator>weisnobody</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42698967</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42698967</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by weisnobody in "God Is in the Details"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I found this interesting because of how it compares with:<p>* discussions regarding if the glass is half full or half empty (it is of course, neither; it's full... part with liquid and part with air... unless of course it's in a vacuum.)<p>* what appears to be the (what appears to be common) tendency to look at / dwell on the negative things.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 22:46:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30473314</link><dc:creator>weisnobody</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30473314</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30473314</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[God Is in the Details]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://arunkprasad.com/log/god-is-in-the-details/">https://arunkprasad.com/log/god-is-in-the-details/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30473109">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30473109</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 22:26:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://arunkprasad.com/log/god-is-in-the-details/</link><dc:creator>weisnobody</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30473109</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30473109</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by weisnobody in "Ask HN: What is your favorite fiction book?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>More science fiction than just fiction:<p>* Spider series by W. Michael Gear<p>* Forbidden Borders series by W. Michael Gear<p>* The Change series (aka Emberverse) by S.M. Stirling (first 6)<p>* The Girl with all the Gifts by M.R. Carey<p>* Dream Park by Larry Niven and Stephen Barnes<p>* In The Country of the Blind by Michael Flynn<p>* Me by Thomas T. Thomas<p>* A State of Disobedience by Tom Kratman<p>* Merchant Princess series by Charles Stross<p>* Daughter of the Empire series by Raymond E. Fiest and Janny Wurts<p>* Ecolitan series by L.E. Modesitt Jr<p>* Freehold by Michael Z. Williamson<p>* The Game is Life series by Terry Schott<p>* The Aeronaut's Windlass by Jum Butcher</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:33:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30418346</link><dc:creator>weisnobody</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30418346</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30418346</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by weisnobody in "Tell HN: 1Password shares passwords you don't want shared"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have different experience with v 7.<p>Vault for Saving in preferences is set to Primary.<p>If I select a specific vault to view in 1 password, then end up on a website and create a password, 1Password mini has the viewed vault as selected when it asks to save the password, not the vault I've specified as where to save new passwords.<p>This has been long standing behavior in 1 Password.<p>Still on 7 because I'm using a mix of vault locations and while I'm using both teams and personal 1password, I have other vaults in other locations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 18:44:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30376928</link><dc:creator>weisnobody</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30376928</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30376928</guid></item></channel></rss>