I've seen that one!

As soon as I see a clickbait thumbnail/title, I ask to not show it anymore.

On a daily basis I get 90% of interesting content on the home page.

It particularly works great for music; now I get better recommendations from YouTube than from Spotify (which is my main music platform).

My coding is done with OpenCode with an OpenRouter API Key.

Going with KiloCode would be doing the same, but with some more layers.

And given that I can't see the on-demand API pricing, I'm really not convinced on how it would be an improvement.

Having access to dozens of models through a single API key, tracking cost of each request, being able to run the same request on different models and comparing their results next to each other, separating usages through different API keys, adding your own presets, setting your routing rules...

And once you start using an account with multiple users, it's even more useful to have all those features!

Not relying on a subscription and having the right to do exactly what you want with your API key (using it with any tool/harness...) is also a big plus to me.

With their drones they now have cameras roaming freely everywhere.

Yeah I thought that it would be the KS range but didn't see anything close in term of pricing.

16TB for $35 is a no-brainer!

I'm currently migrating away from a KS because the disks are almost dead now so I had to go with another solution for TB storage.

But it was great when it was working!

I would have considered it when rebuilding my media infra but haven't seen anything close to this

Only an AI would bother to create a throwaway account to post such a shallow comment that is mostly fearmongering to push people to use AI.

  > However, code quality is becoming less and less relevant in the age of AI coding, and to ignore that is to have our heads stuck in the sand. Just because we don't like it doesn't mean it's not true.

  > [...]

  > We are increasingly moving toward a world where people who aren't sophisticated programmers are "building" their own apps with a user base of just one person. In many cases, these apps are simple and effective and come without the bloat that larger software suites have subjected users to for years. The code is simple, and even when it's not, nobody will ever have to maintain it, so it doesn't matter. Some apps will be unreliable, some will get hacked, some will be slow and inefficient, and it won't matter. This trend will continue to grow.

But I don't see how it can be used as an argument for "code quality is becoming less and less relevant".

If AI is producing 10 times more lines that are necessary to achieve the goal, that's more resources used. With the prices of RAM and SSD skyrocketing, I don't see it as a positive for regular users. If they need to buy a new computer to run their vibecoded app, are they really reaping the benefits?

But what's more concerning to me is: where do we draw the line?

Let's say it's fine to have a garbage vibecoded app running only on its "creator" computer. Even if it gobbles gigabytes of RAM and is absolutely not secured. Good.

But then, if "code quality is becoming less and less relevant", does this also applies to public/professional apps?

In our modern societies we HAVE to use dozens of software everyday, whether we want it or not, whether we actually directly interact with them or not.

Are you okay with your power company cutting power because their vibecoded monitoring software mistakenly thought you didn't paid your bills?

Are you okay with an autonomous car driving over your kid because its vibecoded software didn't saw them?

Are you okay with cops coming to your door at 5AM because a vibecoded tool reported you as a terrorist?

Personally, I'm not.

People can produce all the trash they want on their own hardware. But I don't want my life to be ruled by software that were not given the required quality controls they must have had.

Apparently OP is not following this one, but I see that _some_ proper nouns are not capitalized (like github, singapore, overglade...) while others are.

Should I update my userscript to handle an incoming new trend?

And they still don't see the point of EVs.

Those short-sighted people are the ones cheering for fascism, so the current events have no impact on their vote.

To me, since I always need to have two apps side by side, a 34" screen have done wonders.

I have my main app as a regular 16/9 window, and the secondary on the side.

By putting the screen at the right distance and height, I don't have to move my head and my eyes just move a little to go through everything on the screen.

And my main window still give me more information than if I had full-screened it on my MBP 14" screen (typically, I can see my whole Jira dashboard on the 34" screen while I have to scroll on the 14").

On the other hand, having two screens (laptop + external) is terrible. Not the same resolution, having to turn the head...

------------

One thing that is bothering me reading the article: I find the whole clutter on OP's desktop quite distracting!

The cables coming out of the laptop, the things on the wall behind the laptop... That's something that would definitely kill my focus!

At the office and at home, I've put a blank wall/separator in front of me so the only thing in my vision is the screen.

  - sharing it easily between computers/users (docker pull registry/image:tag)
  - having the appropriate binary version embedded in your code through a docker-compose in your repo
  - having custom aliases dedicated to hugo included (build/serve/run...)
  - using the exact same image in your CI/CD
  - not "polluting" your local computer with some more stuff

I have a docker image with a given version of Hugo and I've been using it for years now.

That's the beauty of building HTML: you don't HAVE to stay up to date to get security fixes.

Creating/maintaining Shortcuts is such a pain!

Having to do it on a small iPhone screen with a touchscreen keyboard, through a no-code interface...

I want an actual text editor, I want to version things with git...

It feels like with Cherri I'll finally be able to actually do things!

Thanks!

We're talking about people that didn't bother about an event scheduled in 365 days.

Why would they care about something that may happen in 2029?

No later than last week I had to setup a service using a 365 days cert that was provided to me as a ZIP archive.

The provider have everything in place to set automated renewal.

But they decided against it because it forces providing us with (scoped) API access to the provider.

Instead they put a reminder in Outlook and forgot about it.

Hopefully in ~50 weeks from now someone will see the reminder, decide to act on it, find someone available with access to the provider to renew the certs and someone available that'll read the doc I had to wrote explaining how to put new certs in place, someone willing to schedule the operation... all of that before the certs do actually expire.