<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: wikiiiisksklhll</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=wikiiiisksklhll</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=wikiiiisksklhll" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wikiiiisksklhll in "What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Quora had a lot more arrogant mods, but a much shorter peak when it was useful. Now it’s not even worth for AI models to train on its content, it’s even worse than expert-sex-change, the site that was so bad in incentivized SO’s creation.<p>I still remember when quora was launched and people claimed it was more welcoming for open-ended questions, when it was obvious from day one it was the opposite, extremely hostile to any newcomers. It actually more appeared to be mostly a community of assholes that was expelled from SO.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 05:06:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965157</link><dc:creator>wikiiiisksklhll</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965157</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965157</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wikiiiisksklhll in "What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Q&A sites in the age of LLMs are dead.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 04:51:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965086</link><dc:creator>wikiiiisksklhll</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965086</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965086</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wikiiiisksklhll in "What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So is wikipedia.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 04:43:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965047</link><dc:creator>wikiiiisksklhll</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965047</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wikiiiisksklhll in "What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve had the opposite experience with wikipedia and have stopped posting there forever.<p>My edits at wikipedia, for several different topics, were reverted, for bullshit reasons. One was ”the process here at wikipedia is for edits to be mindlessly reverted, then debated thoroughly, and maybe later rewritten as the mods wants it”. I.e. as a topic expert, just adding information as drive-by is apparently out of the question.<p>Another reason was adding anything about the future, like information about upcoming, scheduled events, was seen as advertising. It’s of course also not consistently applied across wikipedia but the mods couldn’t care less.<p>It’s far, far worse than SO. Complaints I’ve seen about SO’s moderation rules have always been to keep assholes away, thank god.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 04:31:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964993</link><dc:creator>wikiiiisksklhll</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964993</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964993</guid></item></channel></rss>