Also HN users: "I'm not going to read the article because you told me up front you wrote the words yourself."

What a picky bunch we are.

Same experience as you, also: many sites actually work well enough without JavaScript, and the ones that do require it to display anything make me pause and ask if I truly want to give that site the privilege of running code on my computer. Majority of the time the answer is no.

[(x%3<1)*'Fizz'+(x%5<1)*'Buzz'or x for x in range(1,101)]

edit: Hacker News stripped the * character. Now it's properly escaped.

Don't get me wrong: I hope you are right, and I am generally optimistic about the future of AI.

But do you really think, in a world filled with examples of big software companies repeatedly taking away or hamstringing capabilities we've taken for granted, that you can just count on a big tech company hosting cheap inference on incredibly powerful models forever? Surely we have learned by now that these companies do not exist to provide a public service to us, and the government cannot always be counted on to have the best interests of the citizens in mind.

I mean, how many times have we seen this in just the past decade or two?

- Consistent attempts to pass legislation weakening or banning the use of encryption

- Exorbitant Reddit API pricing (still salty about the death of the amazing Apollo app)

- Google fighting against sideloading on android

- US gov't issuing export control directive to suspend access to Fable/Mythos

- US lawmakers considering ways to regulate adoption of open weight models

- Chinese officials considering restricting overseas access to their most advanced models

I can absolutely see a much more restricted, closed down, and expensive future due to a combination of government regulations (regardless of which nation is doing it) and big companies rug-pulling as the check comes due on all the billions of dollars spent to get here.

Yes, of course the most economical path is to hand over all your data and become fully dependent on a cloud provider who is already operating as scale, hoping that they won't change/remove models, hamstring capabilities, or raise prices.

If this were a thread about hosting your own email or blog or cloud photos, you'd have plenty of people out here telling you how easy it is to do it yourself instead of relying on Gmail for email or WordPress/Medium/Substack for blogging, or iCloud for cloud photos.

And yet, without fail, every single thread about self hosting local models seems to have some copy/paste form of this cost-savings argument.

Where is the appreciation for this cool thing GP built? Where is the appreciation for the desire to figure out how to host your own version of the incredible capabilities that were not available merely a few years ago? And why, on this site of all places, would someone advocate trading all of the knowledge and independence gained from learning how to host something like this ourselves in favor of throwing it all over the wall to Google?

Come on.

This is my experience with basically all of AWS documentation. It is nearly always either (1) far too high-level to be of any actual use, or (2) far too verbose, with a massive volume of superfluous information I need to parse and discard before I get to the stuff I am trying to figure out.

As just one example, I recently needed to link an AWS Partner Central account with an AWS Management account, and process and documentation was painfully complicated: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/partner-central/latest/getting-s...

I have found myself empowered by AI to tackle all sorts of things that would have too high of a barrier to entry for me to want to spend my limited time on as a busy father who is also working at a small startup.

And when I say that, I do NOT mean that I can crank out a bunch of slop and label it as something I produced even though I don't understand the code. I mean that I can do things like go back to college math that I never appreciated at the time and honestly felt too scared of. I mean having an on-demand math tutor that ask clarifying questions to as I struggle through the problem sets.

I have found that it actually accelerates learning how to code in various problem domains because I can tell it to answer my questions at a conceptual level and be a sounding board, but to never actually write code for me. It can review the code I write and gently nudge me without giving away the answers, so that I still struggle through the learning process and actually gain the knowledge.

And finally, for the first time in like 10 years of feeling overwhelmed and daunted by the prospect of learning game development (I have no background in that), I have found Codex to be an incredible boon for learning with the Godot engine. It helps me understand the terminology so that I know what to search for and what documentation to read. It helps me map my computer science knowledge from other domains into the game world, and to understand why things are structured the way they are. And because Godot saves all of the scenes and geometry and lighting and shaders to the file system as text files, Codex can inspect the results of the work I'm doing in the IDE and help me track down things I'm stuck on, and explain what the issue is. For example, why my pre-baked global illumination lightmap is breaking my ambient lighting configuration.

I know it has never been easier to cheat and skip the hard work that results in actually learning something, but for me, personally, I cannot believe the incredible value that $20 a month has provided me. I have never been more excited and eager to dive into tackling hard things I had previously been afraid of or simply too overwhelmed to attempt.

It has never been easier to quickly prototype and get a feel for some idea you have in your head to see if it even has legs. Simply seeing a quick prototype of an idea is often all of the excitement and fuel I need to then take it and make it a real project.

(And also your point about immediately being re-cached a good one)

They're not important if nothing can connect to the TV.

> Or you can disable your TV's connection to the internet so it can't send information back, but that obviously makes it less useful

It is far from obvious because smart TVs are nothing more than data collection devices running thoughtlessly designed and user-hostile reskins of the android operating system and running on criminally underpowered hardware.

> [...] and will also disable the voice controls anyway.

Good.

No TV of mine ever has or ever will get a connection to the Internet. It is a dumb display panel whose only job is to try not to corrupt an otherwise perfectly fine HDMI signal from my Apple TV with stupid gimmicks like AI picture enhancement and software frame smoothing/interpolation.

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/07/14/apple-prismml-ai-compres...