<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: wk_end</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=wk_end</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 21:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=wk_end" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Why Japanese companies do so many different things"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not really? If I were to describe the issues inflicting the west, none of too-small homes, high suicide rates, or an economy based on long hours of white collar work would immediately come to mind.<p>Rather, the west seems to be characterized mostly by insanely expensive housing caused by an extreme antipathy towards denser housing as populations grow, and a K-shaped economy where white collar coastal elites are actually doing relatively well but everyone else - namely blue collar and service workers - are doing worse and worse. Suicide rates aren't rising dramatically, and are nowhere near where they were in Japan at their peak in the 80s, which itself was always overstated (they were higher than they were in the US at the time, but were comparable to many other western countries).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 18:24:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239513</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239513</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239513</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Why Japanese companies do so many different things"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I really don't really think there's much political or propaganda interest in getting Westerners to idealize Japan, at this point.<p>Now back in the 80s? Back in the 80s, despite being aligned with the West, they were perceived a lot like China is today. Everyone was scared that they were going to start eating the West's lunch and various negative stereotypes and exaggerations started to bubble up: it was a futuristic land, but a futuristic land of suicides, with little drone-like salarymen crammed into little shoebox apartments the size of a Western bathroom, working 20 hour days.<p>Between the Plaza Accords and the bubble bursting and decade after decade of Lost Decades, the Japanese threat was successfully neutralized. I think Cool Japan is mostly something they've earned for themselves, frankly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 17:56:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239155</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239155</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239155</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Alberta to hold referendum on whether to remain in Canada"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> This seems extremely surprising - I've never heard of this sort of thing before with any other country.<p>It's a little surprising - even as a Canadian - if you're unfamiliar with Canadian politics/history/civics, but Canada is more loosely held together than most other countries, including the US. And a comparison with the US is instructive, because Canada's founders were unifying the country the wake of the US Civil War and were working very much in response to it: there was a fear that the US would turn imperial in an exercise of national unity and begin trying to snatch up the rest of the continent from the British and a belief that the British wouldn't care to defend them, which was arguably the primary motivation for Confederation: to form a unified front against American expansionism. And the Fathers of Confederation had seen how horrible the Civil War was and wanted to prevent that sort of thing from occurring, so the provinces - like in the US, formerly independent colonies - were given more power than the States, with the separation of powers clearly and rigidly defined.<p>The Clarity Act itself wasn't part of Confederation, but that's the cultural legacy that informs it: a civilized process allowing provinces to separate without bloodshed is just about as fundamentally Canadian as anything.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 16:36:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238223</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238223</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238223</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Deno 2.8"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When Deno first came out it was deliberately incompatible with Node, which limited its ecosystem and audience. Bun came along with a lot of Deno's great features but also Node compatibility, and people really took to that.<p>But Deno's got Node compatibility now, and Node has adopted a lot of the features that make Deno and Bun so usable. So I'm not sure the choice matters so much these days.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238043</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238043</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238043</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Fender escalates legal campaign against S-style guitars"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I disagree completely with the idea that people only still think of Fender-style guitars as good because of boutique builders. Not that I disagree with the premise that boutique builders are making better guitars for better prices. But rich engineers and lawyers play boutique guitars - almost everyone else, including most professional musicians, still play Fenders (or one of the other big mainstream brands).<p>Fender and even Squier workmanship is fine. Their fundamental designs are both good and iconic. In truth, most guitars on the market these days are pretty good and people mostly just choose the one that makes them feel cool and part of a musical community and lineage. So people would continue to gravitate towards Fender-style guitars for literal generations, as long as guitarists revere the legion of Fender players before them.<p>I say “would” because the damage here is IMO reputational. It doesn’t matter how much guitarists revere Hendrix, Gilmour, Clapton, and a zillion other legendary Strat players if enough word gets around that Fender guitars are made by assholes. They’ll stop making people feel cool. Corporate lawfare is extremely not rock ‘n’ roll.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 02:04:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231129</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231129</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231129</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Lost Images from the 1945 Trinity Nuclear Test Restored"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well that's a fusion reaction, but close enough.<p>Every time I see a photo or video of a nuclear explosion, it's simultaneously the most incredible thing I've ever seen and the single worst thing I've ever seen. I can't imagine what it must have been like to witness it first-hand, with no prior expectation of how monstrous a nuclear explosion would be until there it is in front of you in an instant.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 17:10:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225987</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "OpenBSD 7.9"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a new account, and by default new accounts have their posts flagged/dead I think?<p>FWIW my guess is you're right - this user looks like a bot based on this comment and their other one; I've noticed that somewhat-vacuous praise for a post is a bot tendency. Although it's also a human tendency, so maybe too soon to tell. What a world.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 20:01:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198664</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198664</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198664</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Hyperpolyglot Lisp: Common Lisp, Racket, Clojure, Emacs Lisp"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>With all due respect, if this page adds a column for everyone's personal Lisp, it'll be as wide as the Pacific.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 23:55:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187524</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187524</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187524</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Prolog Basics Explained with Pokémon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One of the neat things about Prolog is that queries can be run both forwards and backwards, so I believe this article should already have you covered ;)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 05:23:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175834</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175834</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175834</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "US inflation jumps to 3.8% as energy costs surge from Iran war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Domestically maybe, but international buyers aren't giving billions to American arms manufacturers to prop up American jobs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 14:59:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109311</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109311</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109311</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Show HN: Rust but Lisp"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Scheme doesn't have Rust semantics, though?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 23:01:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079120</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079120</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079120</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "PC Engine CPU"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>These sorts of things - sprites and scrolling tilemaps - were pretty standard for consoles of the time. C.f. the NES, Master System, Game Boy...<p>OTOH if you're European, my impression is that micros were more popular in the 80s and early 90s than dedicated game consoles, and I guess those tended to lack robust sprite/scrolling support, and tended to be more frame buffer-y.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 16:50:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065669</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065669</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065669</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "PC Engine CPU"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The PC Engine could theoretically do more colours on screen (though things like colour math and mid-screen palette changes do complicate that a bit...), but only had 9-bit wide palette entries compared to the SFC's 15-bit colour depth, which allowed for a lot more subtlety and richness.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 16:19:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065233</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065233</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065233</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "PC Engine CPU"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Remember that the PC Engine came out in 1987, over three years before the SFC did. That makes Nintendo's CPU decisions even more questionable, but also explains the huge gap in graphics hardware - not just more background layers, but also effects like transparency, scaling and rotation, and richer colours.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 16:15:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065177</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065177</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065177</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Wolfenstein 3D for Gameboy Color on custom cartridge (2016)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some SNES games offloaded varying degrees of computation to on-cart chips, but I don't believe any NES games did. There was a Hellraiser game in development for the NES that was supposed to ship as a Z80-powered "super cartridge" but it was canceled.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:09:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045283</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045283</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045283</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "IBM didn't want Microsoft to use the Tab key to move between dialog fields"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't think even modern-day Microsoft is anywhere near as bureaucratic as IBM, but yeah - it seems almost inevitable that as a software company grows it'll lose an "undisciplined hacker" culture and become stuffier, for better or worse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:25:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026511</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026511</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026511</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "I am worried about Bun"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You should probably caveat any post you make about security concerns with that, so people can more easily judge whether your concerns line up with their threat model.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 01:28:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017004</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017004</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017004</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in ""Parse, don't validate" through the years with C++"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The point of parse-don't-validate is that the type checker prevents you from having a value of a particular type that's invalid.<p>Pointer-or-NULL doesn't work, because all pointers are nullable in C; you can always have a Foo* (NULL) that's doesn't actually point to a valid Foo.<p>Invalid sentinel values are definitionally values of a particular type that are invalid. Same with an is_valid field.<p>An out field in the constructor means that whatever you actually return in the case of an error is going to be a well-typed Foo that's invalid.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:51:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47964325</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47964325</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47964325</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "The Zig project's rationale for their anti-AI contribution policy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ur/Web! That's something I haven't heard about in ages. Is it still in active development? In what circumstances are you using it? Fun, your own startup, is some secret big commercial user of it...?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 05:46:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47958623</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47958623</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47958623</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by wk_end in "Kyoto cherry blossoms now bloom earlier than at any point in 1,200 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In this very thread, two posts up, the direct parent of the comment you're replying to, I gave you a link to a visualization of the climate record and asked you to look at it, and pointed out that the sudden and unprecedented rapid rate of change since the Industrial Revolution is precisely what leads us to believe this isn't natural.<p>You responded by insisting (without evidence) that "the climate record over the looooong term simply is not that accurate". And now here you are telling someone <i>else</i> to "look at the climate record", the climate record that shows <i>precisely what they're saying</i>, the very same climate record you cast dispersions on moments ago, hoping to somehow trick them into not believing their own lying eyes. You're not operating in good faith.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:42:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47957081</link><dc:creator>wk_end</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47957081</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47957081</guid></item></channel></rss>