Doesn't matter as neither will see significant adoption.

Considering demographic trends, soon such arguments will sound very hollow.

Substitute static typing for TDD in your comment, and it will remain equally valid statement.

They don't. No one generates GBs of simulation data and create plots on their phones, and this is what "app" I am working on is doing.

Venice and Ragusa (and Genoa) were oligarchic states, had laws, and used force to enforce these laws. Civic liberties were suspended or heavily restricted.

Everything that was directly lived has moved away into the Internet.

Not everything is yet another shitty b2c "app".

There are whole industries where cross-platform support is irrelevant, as paying customers just keep using Windows.

This says much more about you, Last Man, than anything else.

But that's what a "machine" is.

It is because EU is not a single state, and member states have very different perspectives not only on Russia threat, but also on "digital sovereignty".

Everyone saying "EU should do something" is just blind towards political reality.

Oh, how funny.

God help us.

Maybe after few another "we are switching from language X to language Y" blogposts.

It shouldn't be surprising - people conflated leftism with liberal progressivism, but they are not synonymous.

> His work builds extensively on Plato, Lucretius, and Deleuze's concept of the Simulacrum.

Not really, Baudrillard is far more nuanced than "it's all fake", doesn't say much about "quality" (actually, hyperreal is "more real than real", and simulation is better than thing being simulated - that's why it is so pervasive), and he takes much more from Debord than Plato.

I apologize, but your comment seems to me based on YT video essays or LLM summaries, not on Baudrillard's writing.

Because the feedback loop of writing few lines of Python inside Jupyter cell is much shorter than with your currently favorite AI tool. It costs less too.