<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: woopwoop</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=woopwoop</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 08:41:32 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=woopwoop" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Refuse to let your doctor record you"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's not a nit. There's not much left of the articles point once you take this on board.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892279</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892279</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892279</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "In math, rigor is vital, but are digitized proofs taking it too far?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Rigor is not the whole point of math. Understanding is. Rigor is a tool for producing understanding. For a further articulation of this point, see<p><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9404236" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9404236</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:40:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574978</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574978</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574978</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Why the global elite gave up on spelling and grammar"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But Houston Street is older than Sam Houston, and was always pronounced that way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 17:51:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47338836</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47338836</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47338836</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "You Bought the AI Licenses. Why Is Only One Developer Getting 10x Results?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Machine generated text.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 14:55:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47324119</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47324119</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47324119</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "ai;dr"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I actually have worked in this space and it, uh, has not shaken my belief that powerpoint talks are bad.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 20:02:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46994298</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46994298</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46994298</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "ai;dr"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I like the idea that various communications media have implicit social contracts that can be broken. In my opinion, power point presentations break an implicit social contract that is held in handwritten talks: if it's worth you displaying a piece of information, so that I the listener feel the need to take it in or even copy it down, it has to be worth your time to actually physically write it on the board. With power point talks this is not honored, and the average power point talk is much, much worse than the average chalk talk. I bet there are lots of other examples.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 17:47:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46992220</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46992220</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46992220</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "The chess bot on Delta Air Lines will destroy you (2024) [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Last time I flew Delta they no longer had this bot, which made me sad. One of my favorite parts of flying was getting absolutely crushed into a tiny cube by the airplane seat's easy chess bot, and then again by the airplane seat itself when the person in front of me reclines their seat.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 20:33:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46593910</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46593910</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46593910</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "When someone says they hate your product"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good negative feedback is a public service, a gift from the critic to you, and a severely undersupplied one in this world we live in.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 02:33:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46428851</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46428851</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46428851</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Two kinds of vibe coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you think that the average person can get a gold on the IMO?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 22:04:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46331505</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46331505</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46331505</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Pro-democracy HK tycoon Jimmy Lai convicted in national security trial"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2019, NPR's planet money did a segment on the Hong Kong protests that heavily featured Jimmy Lai. This segment from the end has always stuck with me.<p>GOLDSTEIN: China has not allowed more freedom of speech. Publications can still be shut down for criticizing the government. And yet, China has gotten richer. It started to develop its own financial center in Shanghai. Foreign money can now flow into China without going through Hong Kong, so the Chinese Communist Party doesn't need Hong Kong as much as it used to.<p>This has led to more and more tension between people in Hong Kong and the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese government. In 2014, there was a fight over how to choose the government official who runs Hong Kong, and a million people in Hong Kong took to the streets to protest. Just last month, the government official who runs Hong Kong wanted to pass a new law that would allow people in Hong Kong to be extradited to China to stand trial. The people in Hong Kong said, we don't trust your mainland courts. Two million people protested in the streets, including, by the way, Jimmy Lai, who is now in his 70s.<p>What was it like? What was it like walking that day?<p>LAI: I was very excited - when you see so many people, you know, is fighting for a moral issue. We don't have guns. We don't have tanks. We don't have anything. The only thing we have the Chinese government don't is the moral authority we have, the moral courage we have.<p>GOLDSTEIN: The moral authority and courage, yeah.<p>LAI: Yes.<p>GOLDSTEIN: A few weeks later, on July 1, on the anniversary of Hong Kong's return to Chinese rule, protesters broke into the Hong Kong legislature buildings, smashed glass walls and spray-painted graffiti. Chinese leaders see these protesters and Jimmy Lai, for that matter, as agents for foreign influence - as, you know, basically latter-day colonialists. His house has been firebombed, and there was an assassination plot against him.<p>LAI: I stopped thinking about this because if I let the fear frighten me, I cannot go on, you know, because with what I have taken up, I have to sustain it. I will be the last to leave. That is like a captain who cannot jump the ship.<p>GOLDSTEIN: I mean, you're rich. You could leave if you wanted.<p>LAI: Yeah. If I'm rich but an a*hole...<p>GOLDSTEIN: (Laughter).<p>LAI: ...What my kids will think about me?<p>GOLDSTEIN: Yeah.<p>LAI: You know, being rich, you can be very poor...<p>GOLDSTEIN: Go on. Say more.<p>LAI: ...Because if you only have money, you lost the meaning, you lost the dignity, you lost everything as a human being. What else do you have?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:04:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46277139</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46277139</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46277139</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "The past was not that cute"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, Malthusian society was very boring, that's my point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:28:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46192598</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46192598</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46192598</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "The past was not that cute"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But in this world the distribution of social backgrounds in the population had very low entropy. Over 90% of people were just working the land.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 05:16:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46188640</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46188640</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46188640</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "The past was not that cute"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If the Canterbury Tales had been actually representative of the time in which they were written, it would not have been the Knight's Tale, the Miller's Tale, the Reeve's Tale, etc. It would have been the Subsistence Farmer's Tale, the Subsistence Farmer's Tale, the Subsistence Farmer's Tale, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2025 17:30:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46183382</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46183382</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46183382</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe? But you could have written this same thing in 1999 with OpenAI and Google replaced by Google and Yahoo, respectively.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 20:31:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46126423</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46126423</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46126423</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Is Matrix Multiplication Ugly?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Matrix multiplication is not ugly, but matrices themselves are ugly, mainly because they encode the arbitrary operation of choosing a basis. There's nothing especially nice about the pixel basis for images, or about the token basis for language. But of all the things that make up modern deep learning, matrix multiplication is surely the _least_ ugly. Relu/gelu is not pretty! Batch normalization is vomit-inducing!! Imagenet normalization? JFC!!!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 21:14:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46018334</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46018334</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46018334</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Gwern's "Stem Humor" Directory"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://people.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/zagier/files/math-mag/63-2/fulltext.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://people.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/zagier/files/math-mag/63-2/f...</a><p>"How often should you beat your kids?", by Don Zagier.<p>> This note is a follow-up to the note "How to beat your kids at their own game" by K. Levasseur, in which the author proposes the following game to be played against one's own children: ... Levasseur analyzes the game and shows that on average you will have a score of n + (sqrt(pi * n) - 1) / 2 + O(n^{-1/2}), while the kid, of course, will have an average score of exactly n.<p>> We maintain, however, that only the most degenerate parent would play against a 2-year-old for money, and that our concern should therefore be not by how much you expect to win, but with probability you will win at all.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 20:50:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46018133</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46018133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46018133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "AI World Clocks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The qwen clocks are art.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 04:52:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45935138</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45935138</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45935138</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Some people can't see mental images"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are you saying that a non-aphantasic person can recall the eye color of everyone in their office?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 22:33:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45766181</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45766181</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45766181</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "The rising returns to R&D: Ideas are not getting harder to find"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I do not, and have never, understood why absolute R&D investment is compared to relative growth rate in this literature. It would make sense to compare R&D spending as a percentage of GDP to relative growth, or to compare absolute R&D spending to absolute per-year growth, but I remain mystified by the comparison of absolute R&D spending with relative growth.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:11:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44946810</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44946810</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44946810</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Guess I'm a rationalist now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agree, but I think there is another, more important factor. They are a highly visible part of the internet, and their existence is mainly internet-based. This means that the people assessing them are mainly on the internet, and as we all know, internet discourse tends to the blandly negative (ironically my own comment is a mild example of this).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:06:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44323907</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44323907</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44323907</guid></item></channel></rss>