<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: woopwoop</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=woopwoop</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 03:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=woopwoop" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Will it be a golden age or a dark age for mathematics (and science)?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I really don't understand this. Mathematics was and still is the most open intellectual discipline. There was more good work from unknown people recognized than anywhere else. It's one of the reasons all this was possible: there were objective standards that could not be waved away, so when ML models achieved things it couldn't be denied.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 21:01:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50145449</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50145449</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50145449</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Overdose Offsets: Why Every Bag of Fentanyl I Sell Is Net Life-Positive"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the first machine generated text I have seen that I would call genuinely hilarious. A little eerie</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:17:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50098345</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50098345</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50098345</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "AHM Statement on OpenAI's October 6 Release of Mathematical Documents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am a former mathematician now working a regular job (not affiliated with OpenAI). Just speaking for myself, I find this statement deeply embarrassing and at odds with the spirit of open inquiry for which the community of mathematics has (nearly) always been a standard bearer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:44:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50006419</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50006419</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50006419</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Work of Hong Wang]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.40161">https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.40161</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49922539">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49922539</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 15:00:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.40161</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49922539</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49922539</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "CS240 AI Cheating Retrospective"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Second, while the percentage of students identified was substantial, it was still less than 50%.<p>No doubt the student body will learn this lesson, and in the future the number of students identified as having cheated will be near zero.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:34:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49914792</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49914792</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49914792</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "I'm sorry, you're not going to die from an AI-engineered supervirus"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What do you think the word virulence means?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 13:50:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49643709</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49643709</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49643709</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "I'm sorry, you're not going to die from an AI-engineered supervirus"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The author seems to be arguing that it is biologically impossible or something to have a virus with the same transmission properties as COVID but higher virulence. I don't understand what principle he is invoking to make this claim.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 02:03:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49637428</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49637428</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49637428</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Why I Left Google DeepMind"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm like the Japanese soldier who kept fighting into the 1970s on this, but actually signalling is about taking costly action. When people call something virtue signalling what they usually mean is that it's cheap talk, but this is wrong. The whole point of signalling is that it's costly. A more correct application of virtue signalling would be something like those people who contort their lives to genuinely try to produce zero garbage. This is a truly costly action, but it is signalling in the sense that it is more about showing that one cares by being effortful than actually doing something effectual.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 14:42:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49070421</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49070421</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49070421</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in ""Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have a graduate degree in mathematics. AI models can absolutely help you do research math in 2026. I recently asked chatGPT to prove a result which I know to have been published in Advances in Mathematics (a pretty good, but not top tier, journal) this year, and it gave a correct proof which was completely distinct from the one that was published.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 06:14:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48513928</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48513928</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48513928</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "The real cost of owning a home"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I got my mortgage at 2.5% interest. The mortgage was about equal to all of the cash I had before buying, and I'm pretty sure I could (and should) have gotten a much larger mortgage before buying. Mortgages are essentially the only way for ordinary people to access that kind of credit. That's why buying a house is such a good deal. No one's lending an ordinary 30-year-old hundreds of thousands of dollars at 2.5% interest to plow into the S&P 500.<p>Of course, this kind of credit is _incredibly_ risky. People don't think of it this way, but a mortgage is essentially a massively leveraged bet on your local housing market. Which is already gives your risk profile an incredible lack of diversity. The most valuable thing you "own" in the time of your life when you buy a house is usually your future earnings potential, and your house will be the second most valuable thing you own. The thing is, both of these things are highly correlated with your local economy, so buying a house doubles down on your already high exposure to local economic conditions. People think of owning a home as a kind of boring, safe, low risk/low reward investment, but it's really exactly the opposite.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 21:51:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286496</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286496</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286496</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Refuse to let your doctor record you"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's not a nit. There's not much left of the articles point once you take this on board.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892279</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892279</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892279</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "In math, rigor is vital, but are digitized proofs taking it too far?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Rigor is not the whole point of math. Understanding is. Rigor is a tool for producing understanding. For a further articulation of this point, see<p><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9404236" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9404236</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:40:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574978</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574978</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574978</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Why the global elite gave up on spelling and grammar"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But Houston Street is older than Sam Houston, and was always pronounced that way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 17:51:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47338836</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47338836</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47338836</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "You Bought the AI Licenses. Why Is Only One Developer Getting 10x Results?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Machine generated text.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 14:55:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47324119</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47324119</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47324119</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "ai;dr"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I actually have worked in this space and it, uh, has not shaken my belief that powerpoint talks are bad.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 20:02:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46994298</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46994298</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46994298</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "ai;dr"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I like the idea that various communications media have implicit social contracts that can be broken. In my opinion, power point presentations break an implicit social contract that is held in handwritten talks: if it's worth you displaying a piece of information, so that I the listener feel the need to take it in or even copy it down, it has to be worth your time to actually physically write it on the board. With power point talks this is not honored, and the average power point talk is much, much worse than the average chalk talk. I bet there are lots of other examples.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 17:47:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46992220</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46992220</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46992220</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "The chess bot on Delta Air Lines will destroy you (2024) [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Last time I flew Delta they no longer had this bot, which made me sad. One of my favorite parts of flying was getting absolutely crushed into a tiny cube by the airplane seat's easy chess bot, and then again by the airplane seat itself when the person in front of me reclines their seat.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 20:33:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46593910</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46593910</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46593910</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "When someone says they hate your product"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good negative feedback is a public service, a gift from the critic to you, and a severely undersupplied one in this world we live in.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 02:33:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46428851</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46428851</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46428851</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Two kinds of vibe coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you think that the average person can get a gold on the IMO?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 22:04:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46331505</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46331505</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46331505</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by woopwoop in "Pro-democracy HK tycoon Jimmy Lai convicted in national security trial"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2019, NPR's planet money did a segment on the Hong Kong protests that heavily featured Jimmy Lai. This segment from the end has always stuck with me.<p>GOLDSTEIN: China has not allowed more freedom of speech. Publications can still be shut down for criticizing the government. And yet, China has gotten richer. It started to develop its own financial center in Shanghai. Foreign money can now flow into China without going through Hong Kong, so the Chinese Communist Party doesn't need Hong Kong as much as it used to.<p>This has led to more and more tension between people in Hong Kong and the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese government. In 2014, there was a fight over how to choose the government official who runs Hong Kong, and a million people in Hong Kong took to the streets to protest. Just last month, the government official who runs Hong Kong wanted to pass a new law that would allow people in Hong Kong to be extradited to China to stand trial. The people in Hong Kong said, we don't trust your mainland courts. Two million people protested in the streets, including, by the way, Jimmy Lai, who is now in his 70s.<p>What was it like? What was it like walking that day?<p>LAI: I was very excited - when you see so many people, you know, is fighting for a moral issue. We don't have guns. We don't have tanks. We don't have anything. The only thing we have the Chinese government don't is the moral authority we have, the moral courage we have.<p>GOLDSTEIN: The moral authority and courage, yeah.<p>LAI: Yes.<p>GOLDSTEIN: A few weeks later, on July 1, on the anniversary of Hong Kong's return to Chinese rule, protesters broke into the Hong Kong legislature buildings, smashed glass walls and spray-painted graffiti. Chinese leaders see these protesters and Jimmy Lai, for that matter, as agents for foreign influence - as, you know, basically latter-day colonialists. His house has been firebombed, and there was an assassination plot against him.<p>LAI: I stopped thinking about this because if I let the fear frighten me, I cannot go on, you know, because with what I have taken up, I have to sustain it. I will be the last to leave. That is like a captain who cannot jump the ship.<p>GOLDSTEIN: I mean, you're rich. You could leave if you wanted.<p>LAI: Yeah. If I'm rich but an a*hole...<p>GOLDSTEIN: (Laughter).<p>LAI: ...What my kids will think about me?<p>GOLDSTEIN: Yeah.<p>LAI: You know, being rich, you can be very poor...<p>GOLDSTEIN: Go on. Say more.<p>LAI: ...Because if you only have money, you lost the meaning, you lost the dignity, you lost everything as a human being. What else do you have?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:04:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46277139</link><dc:creator>woopwoop</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46277139</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46277139</guid></item></channel></rss>