<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: x1colegal</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=x1colegal</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 08:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=x1colegal" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by x1colegal in "GUIs should be fully keyboard-driven"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree, it's bad if like your mouse isn't working and you need to use a app that only works with a mouse</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 18:47:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49482770</link><dc:creator>x1colegal</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49482770</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49482770</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by x1colegal in "HTTPX2 – A next-generation HTTP client for Python"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cool project bro</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 18:45:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49482747</link><dc:creator>x1colegal</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49482747</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49482747</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tell HN: Adding congestion control and retry tokens to a reliable UDP transport]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've been experimenting with USTP-Secure, a reliable UDP transport I've been building.
The latest version adds:
Optional congestion control
Retry tokens to reduce amplification risk
Optional cleartext + HMAC mode (integrity without encryption)
Authenticated ACK/NACK packets
One design choice I'm still thinking about is congestion control for an intentionally unordered reliable transport.
Unlike TCP, USTPS doesn't enforce ordered delivery at the transport layer. Missing packets can be retransmitted selectively while newer packets continue flowing.
I'm curious how others would approach congestion control for this kind of transport, and whether there are existing designs I should study beyond QUIC, RTP/SRT, and similar protocols.
Project: https://github.com/x1colegal/USTP-Secure</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604799">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604799</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:04:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604799</link><dc:creator>x1colegal</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604799</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48604799</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Updates to USTP-Secure]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/x1colegal/USTP-Secure">https://github.com/x1colegal/USTP-Secure</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48589301">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48589301</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 18:17:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/x1colegal/USTP-Secure</link><dc:creator>x1colegal</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48589301</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48589301</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: Ustps (UDP Speedy Transmission Protocol Secure) and USSH]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hi HN,<p>Over the last few days I've been building USTPS (UDP Speedy Transmission Protocol Secure), an experimental encrypted transport protocol built on top of UDP.<p>The primary goal of USTPS is low-latency video streaming. A server can take a video source and expose it through a USTPS endpoint, while Linux and Android (Termux) clients receive the stream and expose it locally to applications such as VLC, mpv, and FFmpeg.<p>Although streaming is the main focus, USTPS is not limited to media delivery. It can also be used for other reliable encrypted UDP-based applications, which is why I built USSH on top of it.<p>Some of the main design differences compared to TCP-based transports are:<p>- USTPS is reliable but unordered.
- If packet N is lost, later packets can still be accepted and processed immediately.
- Missing packets are recovered through selective retransmission.
- Ordering is handled by the application layer when needed.<p>This means the transport layer itself does not introduce Head-of-Line Blocking. The tradeoff is that applications which require ordering must implement reordering themselves. I consider this a reasonable tradeoff because it avoids forcing every application to pay the cost of transport-level ordering.<p>For media player compatibility, the default USTPS client creates a local TCP endpoint at 127.0.0.1:1238.<p>The client maintains a small reordering buffer (350 ms by default) to give retransmissions time to arrive before forwarding data to the local TCP stream. This allows existing software such as VLC, mpv, and FFmpeg to work without modification.<p>USTPS currently provides:<p>- Reliable delivery using ACKs and selective retransmissions
- X25519 key exchange
- AEAD encryption (AES-GCM and ChaCha20-Poly1305)
- Optional unordered live output mode
- Stream position metadata
- Multi-client support
- Local TCP compatibility output
- No congestion control (currently intentional)<p>While developing USTPS, I also built USSH, an SSH-like remote shell running entirely over USTPS.<p>USSH uses the same unordered transport underneath, but the client reconstructs and orders terminal data before presenting it to the user. This prevents terminal corruption while still allowing the transport layer itself to remain unordered.<p>USSH includes:<p>- Interactive terminal sessions
- PTY support
- Password authentication
- Host key verification (TOFU)
- End-to-end encrypted communication through USTPS<p>I'm currently using USSH from my Android phone through Termux to manage my VPS.<p>The project is very young (less than a week old) and is primarily experimental and educational. I'm interested in feedback from people working on transport protocols, streaming systems, SSH implementations, QUIC, SCTP, and networking software.<p>USTP-Secure:
<a href="https://github.com/x1colegal/USTP-Secure" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/x1colegal/USTP-Secure</a><p>USSH:
<a href="https://github.com/x1colegal/USSH" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/x1colegal/USSH</a><p>Internet-Drafts:<p>USTPS Draft:
<a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-x1co-ustps/" rel="nofollow">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-x1co-ustps/</a><p>USSH Draft:
<a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-x1co-ussh/" rel="nofollow">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-x1co-ussh/</a><p>Questions, criticism, and suggestions are welcome.</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48453618">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48453618</a></p>
<p>Points: 13</p>
<p># Comments: 7</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 23:00:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/x1colegal/USTP-Secure</link><dc:creator>x1colegal</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48453618</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48453618</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by x1colegal in "USSH: A shell protocol and client/server pair built on top of USTP-Secure"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh they posted USSH on Hacker News, cool</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 13:58:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48434940</link><dc:creator>x1colegal</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48434940</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48434940</guid></item></channel></rss>