<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: xcjsam</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=xcjsam</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 19:30:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=xcjsam" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xcjsam in "Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Back End Code Generation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The harness mattering more than the model lines up with my experience too. What this paper measures is within-turn constraint decay. The version that bites in multi-agent setups is across-session — the architectural rules an agent wrote down on Monday don't reach the agent making the next change on Tuesday.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258595</link><dc:creator>xcjsam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258595</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258595</guid></item></channel></rss>