<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: xp84</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=xp84</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=xp84" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "Going Dark, and the era of law enforcement hacking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> excuses to turn normal citizens into prison feed<p>What felonies are those normal citizens being convicted of that's landed them in prison?<p>I get the basic 'not wanting everyone's comms to be monitored' part. I think there's an important conversation to be had because indeed, that can't be the answer.<p>But it sounds like you're saying most people who are convicted of felonies based on a jury unanimously being convinced by the electronic evidence against them... those people are unjustly in prison?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306166</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306166</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306166</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "I requested a copy of my data from McDonald’s loyalty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Kmart once had 2,323 stores in the US, and today they have just this one comical one[1] (the picture is worth it, trust me).<p>Nobody's too big to fail, and the way you fail is by making no innovation in your business, not doing optimizations that smarter competitors do, etc. (which was exactly what Kmart spent the 80s and 90s doing).<p>McDonald's would absolutely decline if they simply abandoned all 'loyalty program' ideas, while every competitor leverages them, because those competitors will take customers away little by little. Fewer customers, less money to justify renovations, less people want to open new franchises in the best spots, leading to fewer customers, in a cycle.<p>[1] <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/kmart/comments/1jiusko/the_last_us_kmart/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/kmart/comments/1jiusko/the_last_us_...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 23:32:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305866</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305866</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305866</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in ""Solving a largely imaginary user goal""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Put yourself in the shoes of someone who has no idea what systemwide dark and light mode settings are. There is exactly one reason they are seeking out this control: "It's in dark mode and I want it light" or "It's light mode and I want it dark."<p>The improvement for them is that when they get here and see "Dark, Light, System" with System selected, they wonder "What's System?" Is System important? Will I break something if I change it from System? Is this even the right setting or is this something else? If I want it changed back to Dark later, do I need to choose "System" or should I choose "Dark"? Will this have unexpected effects on my whole computer if I choose "System" in this webpage?<p>> including a button that doesn't always do the same thing when pressed<p>The non-engineer would say the "System" one "doesn't always do the same thing when pressed" and that the "Light" and "Dark" in the 2-way control absolutely always do the same (and desired) thing: Immediately change it to Light or Dark. The side-effect of saving it as an override is, to be fair, a guess at their intent, but it's a very good bet.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 23:23:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305805</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305805</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305805</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in ""Solving a largely imaginary user goal""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Suppose you're editing [...] but you want it to always be in light mode.<p>Your whole objection here hinges on you coming to that realization <i>during the day</i> when it's already in light mode by default. The 99.9% likelihood of "When does a user decide to go looking for the dark/light settings?" is "when the current color != the color desired. For your above scenario you'd go in there the first time you used your word processor <i>at night.</i> You'd flip it exactly once, and it would do what you described you want - stay light forever.<p>Perhaps you're the kind of nerd like me who likes poking through and tweaking every available setting of an app proactively, just for fun... and I'd expect VS Code for instance, to be optimized for "us." But the vast majority of people would never go hunting for the setting to "make it always light" <i>at the time when it's already light.</i> The thesis here is that, for apps not designed for developers, it's probably more valuable to not have those who aren't nearly as expert have to wonder if they're picking the wrong choice by offering a third option.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 23:16:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305754</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305754</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305754</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "Private prisons announce $1.4B in revenue as immigration detentions climb"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm inclined to believe that.<p>Either way - publicly-run or private contractor, if the government is a good steward of public funds, they'll monitor well to avoid waste and remove people who are trying to unjustly enrich themselves. And if the officials are incompetent or corrupt themselves, they'll fail to recognize when those things are happen, or participate themselves. I don't see a big difference in public vs. private unless I imagine a fantasy government run only by officials who are smart and highly ethical.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:43:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49301212</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49301212</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49301212</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "Show HN: We Implemented the IPv8 Internet-Draft in Linux, Libc, and BGP"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have that RFC on my iPhone 9</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:39:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49301161</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49301161</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49301161</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "The TEMU-Fication of Software, Digital Goods and Services"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For sure, the ridiculous promo games are best skipped (when even possible to skip!!) as 99% of the time they're just that you win the right to get a discount on a future order based on this next order. And those discounts are always described as like "a $400 credit" ... when it's really the sum of "50 cents off of $5, $1.50 off of $10... $30 off $250" and so on, so you will have to place like 8 orders of increasingly hilarious value to "use" all of your "$400."<p>All that said, there have been a decent number of things that I bought from them which I've found incredibly useful. Just like, phone stands, ODBII reader, sticky notepads that look like Windows 95 Notepad windows, teeny tiny wireless earbuds I use while sleeping, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:35:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49301110</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49301110</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49301110</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in ""Solving a largely imaginary user goal""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think this is exactly the trap of imaginaryness the author is talking about.<p>For this scenario to unfold the following has to happen:<p>1. OS is set to auto mode
2. It's late afternoon
3. User finds they have (for some reason) in the past turned on the <i>Website</i> dark mode (presumably in the daytime)
4. User wants it light now.<p>This is a pretty tortured hypothetical though. I admit as an engineer, who understands that there's a light/dark signal being passed down, and there's an ability to <i>override</i> that signal, I appreciate separating the "should override" control the way a "3-way" switch allows.<p>But I have to admit, I cannot imagine a real person getting bit <i>in any way</i> by the implementation the author describes. 90% of people set their OS to the "mode" they want, whether it's full-time or sun-based, and that group never even needs to touch or look at this control (We do default to auto, right?). The other 10% are most likely here because they don't understand they can set this in the OS <i>and</i> they apparently want to toggle to the opposite mode. They <i>might</i> be thinking "I want this dark mode until morning" but "we" in the website actually can't really help them with that unless we start prying into what time it is there and build our own time-based mode. So the best we can do for that user is to shift them into "latched dark mode" and let them come back (as they've demonstrated a knowledge to do) when and if they want the 'lights' back on.<p>I'm the first to criticize UI designers who rob users of choice in the name of minimalism -- the Alan Dye approach, but this actually screams "Designer thought hard about the actual intent of the users" to me and I like it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:23:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300927</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300927</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300927</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "Gemini 3.7 Flash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They’ll be back for the less rich people too until no more rich people are dumb enough to stay. Look at CAHSR. There’s no end to how much money California politicians can spend.<p>There’s not a revenue problem in California. There’s a spending problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 14:22:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299093</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299093</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299093</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "I requested a copy of my data from McDonald’s loyalty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Main problem with that is that 90% of us are on group plans and the insurance company doesn’t get to know who’s in the group when they price the premiums for your employer, and on the  (Obamacare) individual plans they can only use broad things like age, etc.<p>If that changes, there’s still the problem that they would have to disclose it, and when people notice, they’d be sure to avoid the restaurant where eating there increases your insurance premiums!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:46:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294247</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294247</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294247</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "I requested a copy of my data from McDonald’s loyalty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agree. I think everyone is just in a bad mood about so-called “privacy” such that any “data” that is “about” you sounds automatically creepy. A shoe store that filed a duplicate of every receipt in a file cabinet is storing the same amount of “yOuR dAtA” as this - and if they hired a kid to go through the year’s receipts and make a list of top customers with their number of visits per year and $ spend, that’s exactly the same level of scary as what’s happening here.<p>If you interact with others, they might keep a detailed record of how you did so. And to some degree that’s <i>their</i> right. And obviously computers keep records basically by default.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:42:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294222</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294222</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294222</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "I requested a copy of my data from McDonald’s loyalty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Other chains have had lots of franchises fail though. A&W used to be big. Long John Silvers. Are you saying McD specifically can’t fail? Or that none can?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:37:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294195</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294195</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294195</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "I requested a copy of my data from McDonald’s loyalty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, a quarter pounder with cheese meal here in California costs $13.79. Combo meals at most fast food range from $13-17. But most of that happened right after the $20 special fast food minimum wage law. So they’re spending more on labor than before, and yet employing like 40% fewer people for that money.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:35:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294185</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294185</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294185</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "I requested a copy of my data from McDonald’s loyalty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, they almost always need to be hiring due to turnover. But they’re not trying to increase their number of people scheduled at once.<p>Also, in California, that’s now the minimum wage allowed by law for fast food. Fast food is a special, higher-minimum exception for some silly reason. (And I say this as someone who spent over 2 years of my youth doing that work.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:29:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294150</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294150</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294150</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "I requested a copy of my data from McDonald’s loyalty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They have reopened them in most (but not all) places. But you also see more new builds designed with no seating, or extremely minimal, uncomfortable seating (e.g. a single high ‘bar’ with a few metal stools against a wall or window. Or even that minus the stools - stand and eat at that bar). The seating is now designed to be more for waiting for a to-go order than for enjoying a meal.
 Compare to a 1990s model that might be much larger and have 10-12 booths around the outside of a big square room, with 10-15 more tables in the center. The game plan is clear from where I sit. The act of dining in at fast food is already not popular among anyone outside of high schoolers and homeless, and that’s the exact same set of diners that makes the most work for them. So, they’d like to just cut it out entirely.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:24:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294121</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294121</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294121</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "Gloomberb"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How is it "adding no value"?<p>It's not crazy to prefer a package manager package to a curl|bash YOLO. OP is stating that preference, which various people have agreed with. If you posted "I love curl|bash install method - please do more of this" that is also fine. Either way it's a signal for both the author and anyone considering shipping this type of software, that their audience may have a certain preference.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 18:00:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289681</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289681</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289681</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "CFTC declares market emergency, orders Kalshi to continue to operate in New York"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> [Owners] can buy some kind of "missed the playoffs" insurance<p>I suppose with Kalshi etc. they can today but "insurance" is just another word for 'betting whatever bad thing will happen.' So if an owner bought any kind of insurance that paid them if they performed poorly, I would assume they were going to do things to intentionally degrade their team's performance, and would hope the league would recognize this as extreme moral hazard and kick them out of the league.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:26:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289162</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289162</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289162</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "I requested a copy of my data from McDonald’s loyalty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We agree mostly. I'm sure they would never "give back" the labor spend they've already 'learned to live without.' Though if you cut minimum wage, it'd suddenly become possible for a new entrant to open a restaurant that would embarrass them, by having twice the staff while holding other things similar. Today that's impossible to do without losing a ton of money, so the current businesses are protected from competition (other than from those "cult" type of place like In-N-N-Out. But how much more business can McDonald's <i>really</i> lose to In-N-Out, since they're basically running at capacity).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:22:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289097</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289097</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289097</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "I requested a copy of my data from McDonald’s loyalty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes and no. Businesses like these succeed and fail at the margins. If McDonalds declines in popularity too much, franchisees start folding and the whole operation could absolutely collapse. All their competitors are looking for ways to exploit areas of weakness, whether it's "value" or "speed" or "quality." Most of the "loyalty" regimes are organized to work on the "value" side of the equation, since the only way a promo (like "free fries" that I received yesterday) has any ROI, is if it's designed in a way to bring in the "right" people who will spend enough money, and to have the way to contact them going forward to bring them back again and again. By contrast, handing out free fries to everyone who walks in the door is not going to be worth the cost.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:15:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289017</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289017</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289017</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xp84 in "I requested a copy of my data from McDonald’s loyalty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> burger<p>I see what you did there<p>I agree, and when you boil it down, "keeping a log of what each customer orders, and doing math and statistics to guess what they'll do in the future"... that describes how every e-commerce operation functions, even going back 25 years. Of course there's a record of what you buy at the place you buy it from. The only reason there wasn't a long-term record like that in fast food in 1990 was that electronic storage was too expensive and paper storage just wouldn't be useful to do any later analysis on.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:09:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49288943</link><dc:creator>xp84</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49288943</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49288943</guid></item></channel></rss>