<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: xunairah</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=xunairah</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 11:13:42 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=xunairah" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "We're Hooked on Satellites. It Could Blow Up in Our Faces"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>diabolical subject bro ;-;</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 12:48:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815504</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815504</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815504</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "Why your company will never scale (or maybe why it will)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>:></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:15:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814674</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814674</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814674</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why your company will never scale (or maybe why it will)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We’re in a copied world. Today, it is so incredibly easy for someone to see what you’re doing and copy your product.
So the question is: How do you actually scale your business to the next level? How do you move past being just a "product" and become a trend, or a brand that you actually dream of?
I believe it comes down to two things: User Laziness and Competitor Laziness<p>1. Making the user too lazy to switch:<p>When you look at Apple, it’s the perfect example. People switch to Apple because of the minimalism, the luxury, or even the peer pressure. But they stay because of the inter-connected interaction.
Once you buy one device, you buy the second, then the third. Eventually, the devices are so interconnected that switching onto another provider like Android, feels inefficient. You’ve made the user too lazy to switch because the cost of leaving your ecosystem is too high<p>-Adobe doesn't just sell Photoshop; they sell a workflow. Once a creative professional has their assets in the Creative Cloud, their fonts synced, and their Lightroom talking to their Premiere Pro, switching to a competitor like Canva or DaVinci Resolve feels inefficient. Even if another tool is cheaper, the user is lazy to leave the ecosystem they’ve built.<p>-Making the company too lazy to implement;<p>-The second part of the scaling equation is what the competition is doing or rather, what they aren't doing.
Apple implements features that other companies feel too lazy to implement, or quite frankly, too insecure to implement. They take big swings on unconventional features that become the new standard. By the time the competition stops being lazy and tries to copy it, Apple has already moved the needle again.<p>-For years, traditional car companies were lazy and insecure about going fully electric. They didn't want to build the charging infrastructure because it was too hard and too unconventional. Tesla didn't just build a car; they built the Supercharger network. Now, other car companies are forced to use Tesla’s tech because they were too slow (or too lazy) to build their own.<p>-When Netflix started producing original content (House of Cards), the big networks were lazy. They thought they could just keep licensing their shows to Netflix forever. They were insecure about changing their cable-TV model. By the time they realized they needed their own streaming services, Netflix had already scaled into a global studio.<p>-To win in the mass market and truly break the game, you have to implement unconventional things. You have to offer the deals, the features, and the interactions that make the user feel a genuine necessity for your product.
It is the most important thing you can do for your business, but it’s also the most difficult. You have to build a world that is so easy to live in, and so hard to leave, that the competition can’t catch up.</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814662">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814662</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:12:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814662</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814662</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814662</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "LLM-Tainted Free Software and Alternatives"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>nice</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 18:17:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557018</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557018</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557018</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "MirageOS – Build Unikernels in OCaml"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>nice website</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 05:56:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513811</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513811</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513811</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "Designing a Test Runner for AI Agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>niceee</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:54:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503543</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503543</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503543</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "Tell HN: Litellm 1.82.7 and 1.82.8 on PyPI are compromised"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Version 1.82.7 is also compromised. It doesn't have the pth file, but the payload is still in proxy/proxy_server.py.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 13:59:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502731</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502731</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502731</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "Predictably, a victim of AI is Wikipedia"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Makes sense. Wikipedia and Math StackExchange built the foundations AI learned from, but now they’re seeing their traffic and influence eroded as AI becomes the first stop for answers even for evergreen topics.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 19:31:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494062</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494062</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494062</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "Django Custom Managers Are Silently Leaking Data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>well-written</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 19:28:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494029</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494029</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494029</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "Infinity Stones of System Design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>6 System Design Concepts Made So Easy Even a Monke Can Understand</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 17:40:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47299248</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47299248</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47299248</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Infinity Stones of System Design]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://manware.notion.site/6-Infinity-Stones-of-System-Design-31c06277068a800da0a7e935fa623b17">https://manware.notion.site/6-Infinity-Stones-of-System-Design-31c06277068a800da0a7e935fa623b17</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47299223">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47299223</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 17:37:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://manware.notion.site/6-Infinity-Stones-of-System-Design-31c06277068a800da0a7e935fa623b17</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47299223</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47299223</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "The shady world of IP leasing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>sourcing crises, 
industry is currently split into two camps:
The 'Dark' Supply Chain: SDKs hidden in flashlight apps, cracked IoT devices (Kimwolf), and malware. The user has no idea they are a proxy. This is unsustainable and, frankly, unethical.
The 'Ethical' Supply Chain: Bandwidth sharing apps (like Honeygain, Pawns, etc.) where the user knowingly installs the software in exchange for payment.
The problem is that Camp #1 is cheaper to run, so it floods the market with 'cheap residential IPs.' Camp #2 requires paying the end-user, which raises the floor price.
Until buyers stop chasing the absolute lowest price per GB, the incentive for 'malware proxies' remains. The solution isn't just router-level blocking (which creates false positives for legitimate P2P), but transparency in sourcing. If a provider can't tell you how they acquired the IP, it's likely stolen.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 09:53:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47286118</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47286118</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47286118</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: How the IP Leasing Market Fakes Legitimacy]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A viral post exposed how datacenter IPs are disguised as residential connections. As a proxy provider, here is the technical reality of how it works—and why we refuse to play that game.<p>This week, an article titled "The shady world of IP leasing" made the rounds on Hacker News and tech Twitter. It argued that IPv4 exhaustion is a myth caused by hoarding, and that the "Residential Proxy" market is largely built on a house of cards—specifically, datacenter blocks that have been scrubbed, subleased, and manipulated to look like home internet connections.<p>They are absolutely right.<p>At Proxyon, we see this every single day. Competitors offer "70 Million Residential IPs" that are actually just hoarded datacenter blocks with a fake mustache.
Here is the technical breakdown of how the "Leasing Laundromat" works, and why we decided to build our infrastructure differently.
The "Geofeed" Loophole (RFC 8805)
The article touched on this, but didn't go deep enough into how easy it is to fake a location.
The internet relies on trust. When you buy a block of IPs from a broker (like LogicWeb or IPXO), you control the narrative. The "magic trick" used by shady proxy providers is RFC 8805.
This allows an IP holder to publish a simple CSV file (a Geofeed) telling the world where those IPs are located.
Reality: The server is in a datacenter in Kansas.
The CSV: 192.0.2.0/24, US, US-NY, New York
The Result: MaxMind, Google, and Cloudflare scrape that CSV and update their databases.
Suddenly, a cheap datacenter IP is sold to you as a "Premium New York Residential Proxy." It costs the provider pennies, but they sell it to you at residential markups.
The "Clean Slate" Business
The most disturbing part of the leasing economy is 'Reputation Laundering'<p>If a subnet gets burned by spam or fraud, it should be dead. That is the immune system of the internet working. But in the leasing market, you can pay a "cleaning fee." Providers will actively petition Spamhaus, Barracuda, and SORBS to delist the IPs, claiming the "issue is resolved," only to lease them to the next bot farm five minutes later.
This artificially keeps "zombie" IPs in circulation, degrading the trust of the entire network.
How we made it Different (The Hard Way)
When we built Proxyon, we had a choice. We could go to these massive leasing marketplaces, rent 10,000 IPs for cheap, fake the geodata, and sell them as "Premium Residential."
We didn't.
We realized that "Privacy" and "Deception" are not the same thing. You come to us for privacy (No KYC), not to be lied to about what you are buying.
-We Don't Fake Residential
If you buy a Residential IP from us, it comes from a legitimate peer or ISP partnership, not a mislabeled datacenter block. We don't use Geofeed manipulation to pretend a server rack is a suburban house.
-We Don't "Launder" IPs
We don't pay bribes to get off blacklists. If an IP in our pool is flagged, we rotate it out and let it cool down naturally. We maintain pool health by enforcing strict ethical usage policies, not by paying "cleaning fees" to cover up abuse.
-True "Pay-As-You-Go" (Anti-Hoarding)
The article correctly identifies that hoarding is the cause of IPv4 exhaustion. Large providers force you into monthly subscriptions where you buy bandwidth you don't use. That is artificial scarcity.
We operate on a non-expiring model. You buy the data, you keep it until you use it. We don't hoard bandwidth or IPs that aren't being utilized.<p>The "Shady World of IP Leasing" isn't going away. As long as RIRs (like ARIN and RIPE) lack the teeth to enforce usage policies, the gray market will thrive.
But as a user, you have a choice. You can buy from the "70 Million IP" giants who are leasing laundered space, or you can buy from providers who are transparent about their sourcing.
We might be smaller than the giants. But our IPs are real.</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47286086">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47286086</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 4</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47286086</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47286086</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47286086</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by xunairah in "[dead]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you look at the marketing of any major proxy provider today, you will see a bold claim: "Access a pool of 70 Million Residential IPs."
As developers, we rarely stop to ask the logistical question: Where do these 70 million people come from?
Do you know 70 million people who signed up to sell their home internet connection for a few pennies? Probably not.
The reality of the residential proxy infrastructure is a fascinating, often murky mix of App Monetization SDKs, Bandwidth Arbitrage, and the "Free" App Economy.
Here is a deep dive into how the sausage is made, and why your scraper’s connection quality depends entirely on a teenager in Ohio playing a free mobile game.<p>The "Free" App Dilemma
To understand where residential IPs come from, you have to look at the mobile app ecosystem.
Let’s say you are an indie developer. You build a free "Flashlight" app, a "Sudoku" game, or a "Weather Widget."<p>You have 50,000 daily active users (DAU).<p>Ad Revenue: Banner ads are terrible. You might make $0.50 CPM (Cost Per Mille/Thousand views).
Premium Subscriptions: Nobody pays for a flashlight app.
You are losing money on server costs.<p>Enter the "Monetization SDK"
One day, you get an email from a Proxy Network (or an SDK aggregator). The pitch is simple:<p>"Include our tiny code snippet (SDK) in your app. It runs in the background. We will pay you $500 per month for your 50,000 users. You don’t have to show ads anymore."<p>To the developer, this is a lifeline. They integrate the SDK. They update their Terms of Service (ToS) to say: "Your device may be used to route public web traffic for research purposes."
The User Experience (The Opt-In)
The user updates the app. A pop-up appears asking for permissions.
The Reality: Users have "Banner Blindness." They click "Accept" to get to the flashlight.
The Result: That device is now a Residential Exit Node.
When a data scientist at a Fortune 500 company buys 1GB of residential bandwidth to scrape Amazon pricing, their request travels from their server -> The Proxy Gateway -> The User’s Phone (running the flashlight app) -> Amazon.com.
Amazon sees a legitimate AT&T or Verizon mobile IP. They serve the data. The proxy provider charges the data scientist $15/GB. The app developer gets a fraction of a penny.<p>The Engineering Nightmare: Churn
This economic model creates a massive engineering challenge for us.
Unlike a Datacenter IP (which lives in a rack and stays online 24/7), a Residential IP is a living, breathing human behavior.
WiFi to 4G: The user walks out of their house. Their IP changes from Comcast (WiFi) to T-Mobile (4G) instantly.
Battery Optimization: Android/iOS kills background processes to save battery. The node dies.<p>The "Pocket" Factor: The user puts the phone in their pocket, losing signal.
A residential proxy pool has a Churn Rate of roughly 10-20% per minute.<p>This is why "Sticky Sessions" (keeping the same IP for 10 minutes) are so hard to guarantee. We aren't just routing traffic; we are playing a game of "Whack-a-Mole" with millions of devices, trying to predict which ones will stay online long enough to load a webpage.
The Ethical Divide: "Silent" vs. "Rewarded"
This is where the industry splits.
The "Silent" Model: The user has no idea. The SDK is hidden in a shady calculator app. This is cheaper for providers but ethically bankrupt (and results in poor connection quality when users delete the app).
The "Rewarded" Model: Services like Honeygain or Pawns.app explicitly tell the user: "Install this app, share your internet, and we will pay you cash."
At Proxyon, we realized that "Silent" SDKs are a ticking time bomb. We focus on sourcing from Rewarded pools.
Why? Because users want to keep the app open. They want to be on WiFi. The connections are faster, the latency is lower, and crucially it’s consensual.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 18:48:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47252025</link><dc:creator>xunairah</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47252025</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47252025</guid></item></channel></rss>