If it sells at margins better than its cost of production, it's a money making machine, it's a company right there.

then focus on functionality such as showcasing crud, use of different databases, etc etc.

good enough to enjoy a hobby?

good enough to get employed?

good enough to get into faang?

i think a better question is to ask what reference materials to study on.

Yandex, Yahoo, and Bing displays this correctly.

This is intentional on Google's end.

it becomes a fucking chore.

gigs thrive on lack of structure.

jobs thrive on structure, stability, consistency, reliability.

turn gigs into jobs then it loses the fun factor.

as i said in separate post, claude works well, but you can still catch it slippin sometimes.

i fucking love claude 3.5 but i still catch it slippin.

as johnson wang of nvidia said, ai wont replace you, but you will be replaced by people who uses AI.

i think the former will eventually come, but the latter is already here.

it's like the idea of taxing the rich. it sounds great until you become one of those rich people.

this idea sounds great until you become a founder or an investor yourself.

these are laws, systems, and regulations that sets the first movers and real builders apart from the average laymen. all comes down to risk/reward incentives.

it's poor people telling the rich how to spend and allocate their money. the rich people will just say "the fuck do you know about it?"

https://github.com/privatenumber/tsx

awful but works.