<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: yasirlatif</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=yasirlatif</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 17:34:13 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=yasirlatif" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yasirlatif in "Technical, cognitive, and intent debt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The "intent debt" framing is the most underappreciated category here. Cognitive and technical debt are at least visible in the code. Intent debt is invisible — it only surfaces when someone makes a change that's locally reasonable but globally wrong because the original constraint no longer exists in any artifact. The hardest version of this is in enterprise systems where the constraint was a regulatory requirement that quietly changed three years ago, but nobody updated the code because the tests still passed. You can't recover intent from a test suite.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47878009</link><dc:creator>yasirlatif</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47878009</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47878009</guid></item></channel></rss>