<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: yellowflash</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=yellowflash</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 07:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=yellowflash" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "The threat is comfortable drift toward not understanding what you're doing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Kernel is a bad analogy, if you understand how it behaves you can understand how its built. LLMs don't have that, their behaviour is not completely defined by how they are built.<p>Every abstraction is leaky, its not like I have 1 in every 100 tickets I work on needs understanding of the existence of filesystem buffers, it's in the back of my mind, it's always there. I didn't read linux kernel source, but I know it's existence. LLM output doesn't have that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 01:13:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655763</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655763</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655763</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "AI Perfected Chess. Humans Made It Unpredictable Again"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Today I learned, Stockfish moved to neural network on 2023. I knew that it was just a minmax with alpha beta pruning and a really good eval function. Now its not.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 09:20:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611962</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611962</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611962</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Fixpoints to think clearly"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Very good question. This is totally dependent on the starting point of the search. The entire domain is not a contraction in such cases, there are sub sets of domains where it is a contraction and as whole it's not. Like multiple pieces where we can apply Banach theorem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 15:36:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47276283</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47276283</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47276283</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Fixpoints to think clearly"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry, can you check now?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 11:09:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47273498</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47273498</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47273498</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fixpoints to think clearly]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.yellowflash.in/posts/2026-03-03-fixpoints-for-clarity.html">https://blog.yellowflash.in/posts/2026-03-03-fixpoints-for-clarity.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47230482">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47230482</a></p>
<p>Points: 16</p>
<p># Comments: 5</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 10:19:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.yellowflash.in/posts/2026-03-03-fixpoints-for-clarity.html</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47230482</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47230482</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Conversation with Claude on Reasoning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was wondering if I could get a different way of thinking about reasoning machines as such. Reasoning models are trying to just externalize the reasoning through chain of thought or fine-tuning on reasoning focused dataset.<p>They all seem very hacky and not really reasoning. I wanted to see if there are alternative fundamental ways to think about reasoning as end by itself.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 17:17:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45350080</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45350080</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45350080</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Conversation with Claude on Reasoning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am trying to get a better understanding of what reasoning could possibly mean. So far, I am thinking that more we are able to compress knowledge more it's an indicator for reasoning. I would like to understand more about these, please tell me where my understanding is lacking or point me what I should learn more regarding this.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 17:05:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45349868</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45349868</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45349868</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Conversation with Claude on Reasoning]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.yellowflash.in/posts/2025-09-23-singularity-claude-conversation.html">https://blog.yellowflash.in/posts/2025-09-23-singularity-claude-conversation.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45349867">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45349867</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 3</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 17:05:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.yellowflash.in/posts/2025-09-23-singularity-claude-conversation.html</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45349867</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45349867</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Carefully Reading Programming Bitcoin]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.yellowflash.in/posts/2025-05-29-programming-bitcoin-handwaved.html">https://blog.yellowflash.in/posts/2025-05-29-programming-bitcoin-handwaved.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44124397">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44124397</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 09:32:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.yellowflash.in/posts/2025-05-29-programming-bitcoin-handwaved.html</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44124397</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44124397</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Ask HN: Has anyone fully attempted Bret Victor's vision?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think observable notebooks like Pluto.jl is something like his vision though not exactly. It's just more general and useful ?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 06:07:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34486021</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34486021</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34486021</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "The mental Universe (2005) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Once, Zhuang Zhou dreamed he was a butterfly, a butterfly flitting and fluttering about, happy with himself and doing as he pleased. He didn't know that he was Zhuang Zhou.
Suddenly he woke up and there he was, solid and unmistakable Zhuang Zhou. But he didn't know if he was Zhuang Zhou who had dreamt he was a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming that he was Zhuang Zhou. Between Zhuang Zhou and the butterfly there must be some distinction! This is called the Transformation of Things"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 16:04:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32566969</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32566969</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32566969</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "The mental Universe (2005) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My understanding is rudimentary, but it doesn't alter the system. But it fixes what state the system should have to produce the given observation, retroactively. Which is counterintuitive in lot of ways. It can be thought as if the observation caused the determination of past state. Do I make sense or I am just talking absolute non-sense.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:11:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32561888</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32561888</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32561888</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Time for Army Corps of Engineers to investigate moving water West?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One of them is per family and other per person (family of size 1). Is it even comparable? I am not saying it is lesser, it's pretty high, probably 200% not 560% if I am right.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 08:11:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32303331</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32303331</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32303331</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Ask HN: What are some cool but obscure data structures you know about?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's how mongodb geospatial indexes work IIRC</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 03:25:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32188137</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32188137</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32188137</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Ask HN: What are some cool but obscure data structures you know about?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Very interested in your idea. How does concurrent updates work with the augumented trees? I have been thinking about the same for a while something like CouchDB but segment aggregations (monoid) augumented so we can do interval queries over time too. But the only thing bothering is augumented trees are notorious of contention on concurrent updates. Do you have any ideas on merging back if we have multiple versions of augumented trees.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 03:19:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32188091</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32188091</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32188091</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Similarity join (Min-hash)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The probability of the `b` being chosen for A is 1 (No other choice) and for B it is 1/2. The probability of `b` being chosen for both (The only common token), is |{(b,b)}| / |{(a, a), {(a, b)}| = 1/2 which is jaccard's similarity |{b}|/|{a, b}|<p>I could have explained that a bit better I suppose.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 10:00:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31975354</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31975354</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31975354</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Similarity join (Min-hash)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.yellowflash.in/2022/05/24/similarity-join.html">https://blog.yellowflash.in/2022/05/24/similarity-join.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31857854">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31857854</a></p>
<p>Points: 60</p>
<p># Comments: 9</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 04:37:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.yellowflash.in/2022/05/24/similarity-join.html</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31857854</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31857854</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Similarity joins on large datasets – Minhash]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.yellowflash.in/2022/05/24/similarity-join.html">https://blog.yellowflash.in/2022/05/24/similarity-join.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31489927">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31489927</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 09:41:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.yellowflash.in/2022/05/24/similarity-join.html</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31489927</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31489927</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Ask HN: The book that did it for you in math and/or CS?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It would be Graham Hutton's Programming in Haskell. That one little chapter on parser combinators was totally worth it.<p>If I can include this functional pearl "A play on regular expression", Not a book though.<p>These two showed how composition and simple abstraction could make the solution super beautiful.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 10:04:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30486859</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30486859</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30486859</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by yellowflash in "Lunar Eclipse: An Email to a Daughter and Son-in-Law"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>True, it's just he loosened the notion of real and virtual to an extent that's unfamiliar to people.<p>Anyway nice profile name. :D</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:40:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20449904</link><dc:creator>yellowflash</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20449904</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20449904</guid></item></channel></rss>