But yes, we can agree that it's not his worse sin. Just adds to a long list.

All military experts agree that bombing a country isn't going to trigger a regime change, and it hasn't so far after weeks of intense bombing. So the answer should be, keep bombing more things and target civilians?

Besides, the Iranian expat community is also a bubble, maybe not representative of the ones who are actually bombed.

Did they also want Trump to destroy the whole civilization and have the country back to stone age like he claimed he would do?

I'm sure there are field that should be absolutely crowded but where you can do something meaningful.

If I had free time, I would write an app to learn foreign languages I'm interested in. I'm pretty sure that there are good apps, but I tried a few ones, and none really fit my needs.

There are also software that I use a lot, like transcribe! which works well, but that I could see how to improve.

So as others mentioned, do something that you would be interested in.

It's a bit the opposite of "don't look up" in that sense that the message isn't in your face. But in the current times, this movie really resonates.

I quickly browsed the top 10 comments, didn't see much negativity.

And maybe this is because this is a forum of "tech/geeks/nerds/stem people" that you'd expect some educated and critical comments.

Maybe you do, but not everybody does. 19.7% of American kids are obese. The hypocrisy is that tech executives promote and lobby for excessive use of their products (even manufacturing addiction), but know better for their kids.

Is that irony or plain naiveness? historically and technically, conquest of space is inseparable from warfare. As for climate change, one can argue that technology is one of the primary driver: aviation alone is estimated to 4% of global temperature rise.

That's an issue I have with Claude actually. I found it very good at breaking abstractions to get the job done. This is what I'd call slope (more so than the class internals).

Yes, it really depends on how much work the agent did produce. It could be as little as doing a renaming or a refactoring, or execute direct orders that require no creativity or problem solving. In which case the agent shouldn't be credited more than the linter or the IDE.

Eventually, things went better when they found the right persons to help with the organization, but it was chaotic and frustrating for a while.

Now some people argue that terrible code is fine nowadays, because humans won't read it anymore...