You sick fucks! How dare you run from Europe!

https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/2855116-she-was-x-you-sick-f... (Your crazy comment deserve just this meme)

https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-icc-prosecutor-karim-...

If you want no Hamas, No Bibi, No apartheid (which the ICJ also said as minority opinion that its just security concerns - i.e. terror attacks) then -

I agree! I want peace! But... maybe - Hamas first? I mean, Israel tried to be first with Ehud Barak... then with Ehud Olmert...

And Be sure to @ me where you called Palestine a "state [that] is bigoted by nature!" You surely done it? Right? By your own standard?

EDIT: You said a lot more, but it's just the same arguments with no rebuttal to the LLM answer so I point you to it again.

I am only sad about HN level of discussion, and how smart people in tech leave their critical thinking, kicking it out the door when the "I-word" is in the article/comment.

[1] https://share.gemini.google/cF5oyWZID7UR

The only other alternative at the time was the US, but with limited immigration after WW2, it was obvious it couldn't be the whole story.

If you have further disagreement, please explain why in the same sentence he wrote "bigoted state project" and 1947.

EDIT: you added "(explicitly colonial)" before Zionism. And I looked at your comment history... Your are deliberately misreading stuff... good luck out there. My last words to you are: At that time before WW2, this entire area was under the Ottomans, so making a government there for Jews (enclave) by BUYING land, is colonial, and not what you try to say which is: "Kill all natives, we are the superior race". Because who at that time thought he could overthrow the Ottomans? But you don't care.

This is the more correct version:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israeli_territorial_...

Very different story told here...

Wat 0_o? Did you even read my comment?

The good times...

In other words: Gamble that (1) your investments appreciate, or (2) that you will find credit rates drop when convenient.

In 1 word: Gamble.

So, either you are rich and have spare money to gamble, which sure, might be beneficial against taxes. But you could also gamble against any other sector (stocks, housing, startups...)

Or, if you are not rich, just put it in the 401k (or eq).

Then say civilians. Don't claim what you can't provide. And DO provide context (like, was it still while the massacre was ongoing [1]). But all I can do is to suggest.

> Good job cherry-picking

Me cherry-picking: Taking the literally first entries, Array[0] and Array[1].

Also, you can't claim cherry-picking as invalid against gish-gallop. Since you can't enjoy the size argument only to retract items on the list after the smallest pushback.

Otherwise I can prove God. How? Every sentence in the Bible... Oh, you found some that are wrong? "Good job cherry-picking"!

And not to mention dozens of more problems with the list (no mentioning any IDF comments, no source for titles, etc.). This is just a bad list. Simple as.

> ICC is clearly investigating

Investigating != Judgment. But good, send them more. But please send them a list starting with items that might hold the smallest of scrutinies. And don't prove it by hinting at conspiracies just because Israel has a security censor. But all I can do is to suggest.

[1]: https://13tv.co.il/item/news/abroad/dynw9-903794689/

Now now... one may mistakenly think you have some inconsistencies in your theory... and you out to revisit them first before demanding more..

https://www.academia.edu/10481823/The_Israeli_paradox_The_mi...

Maybe your third comment will finally succeed...

It's enough to see that you brought a link to the Israeli Military Censor to hint at a conspiracy, to understand who you're dealing with.

But even if you go into the list, you'll see at the top that those who were shot were in the middle of the battle, where Israeli forces were surprised, to the point of massacre alongside civilians. And there, it turns out, they didn't shoot to save themselves by the skin of their teeth, but simply wanted to kill journalists.

Also, a quick search shows that "Mohammad Jarghoun" ("מוחמד ג'רגון") was not a journalist at all, but a media worker, that according to the CPJ [1], during wartime he receives journalistic status. (Also not mentioned in AJ [2]. what a surprise...)

Another comment to the pantheon of "the most logical failures, in the fewest words". And then no one understands why the ICC will never consider such reports..

[1]: https://www.the7eye.org.il/501320

[2]: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/10/at-least-six-pales...

Next one: Cloudflare has an edge in Israel. And has workers who were in Unit8200 before 1991 (per linkedin) and ISRALIES. Who uses Cloudflare? MANY MEDICAL ORGS. Also, Cloudflare is just like MITM (CDN SSL termination). So does ISRAEL SPIES read all your MEDICAL data?

> "To think otherwise is completely naïve" (real qoute from the article btw = no proof)

What a sham article. Trump's TruthSocial level. But hey, most upvoted today (440+ points). And no point on reporting to mods also, I just get copy paste reply.

(And I mean any source for any of your assumptions...)

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44946011

Points: 4

# Comments: 0