Narrators voice: there was, in fact, issues with safety culture at nasa between Kennedy's speech and the moon landing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_1

you can see what mullvad, the company selling a product here, say what the reasoning was.

As i say, smacks of marketing campaign. Did clearcast give the marketing team a gift, or did the marketing team invent it? All we have is Mullvads word, but my word they have been running an extensive campaign in london for a while now.

Step 1: cryptically warn people that their rights are under attack.

Step 2: tell people that you have been banned from saying any more.

Step 3: Conveniently make no mention of the fact that this highly controversial 'banned' ad is absolutely watchable, in the UK, on youtube, with links to it from traditional media adverts.

It is possible to restrict one without the other. The UK, can quite easily stop an advert from saying things like:

>> A paid-for Meta ad and a website listing for an online clothing company misleadingly claimed they were established and owned by armed forces veterans and that they donated a share of profits to PTSD support organisations.

And still allow The Guardian to run a campaign on shadowy organisations funding politics.

Conflating them is done, i feel by those who run companies... i dunno, like VPN's, for the purposes of viral marketing and generating outrage.

https://www.asa.org.uk/codes-and-rulings/rulings.html?q=mull...

This smacks of viral campaign to me.

You avoid having companies, who can swallow the bill, making whatever claims they like without having to much to worry about other than a slap on the wrist - Their claims are already out. J&J, P&G, Unilever et al - you may trust them to do the right thing, i don't.

Then when you add in the ability to advertise prescription drugs?

Well, what could go wrong?

I find it genuinely baffling that that would be the point.

But I'm game if you are?

Jupyter notebooks or excel?

Agreed.

So... why are the administration going in the opposite direction?

> Official departmental paperwork shouldn't look clownish.

Oh. It's about looking clownish. Right. OK. Pull up a chair, this might take a while, and we will get to typefaces pretty late on, I'll be honest

Meaningful? The one that looked into which font was more readable, for the most people

"Here is a thing that makes a slight difference, with no cost, to a small percentage of people"

"Nah, woke. Let's make it worse for them."

There is nothing funny about performative cruelty

The cyclist puts the stick between his spokes.

The cyclist lies on the road, cursing the government, for causing this.

When they said they live in a country where a police force follows kids on bikes

The clues were all there.

This article, also crucially, does not relate to America

Libertarianism really does hit a wall when it comes to kids, in so many ways, doesn't it?

How did you find it, what did you get from it?