my suspicion is that it is the company culture: the hardware engineers are the real engineers. software is a triviality left for the lesser minds. the consequence is they mess up every product... everything they do needs software.

the quantum industry in reality: "Using Shor’s algorithm, the largest integer factored into primes is 15" :)))

the statement is applicable to anthropic today.

- get trigger for sleep - save state to nvram - ack sleep - wake up the same way as normal power-up, state being already in nvram

if this simple protocol is not working in your scenario, you have a uc larping as cpu doing way too much.

> If you do not have the expertise nor time to evaluate technical claims, how do you hope to arrive at correct technical conclusions? > > Surely, you'd trust experts in that case? Like the experts that were involved in a multi-year international standardization effort? Like the one that produced > ML-KEM and ML-DSA? > > Or do you just balk at experts and "trust no one" even to your own detriment?

what detriment? there is no quantum treat, it is made up. at least not in the discussed timelines.

besides, experts are cheap and compromisable, especially for the nation state level bodies like nsa and eu.

all i am saying is there is no good reason to depreciate proven algs, especially not because those two institutions said so.

crazy.

strix halo was released more than a year ago.