In other cases, I have seen it miss the mark when the discussion is not very linear. For example, if I am going back and forth with the SOC team about their response to a recent alert/incident. It'll get the gist of it right, but if you're relying on it for accuracy, holy hell does it miss the mark.

I can see the LLM take great notes for that initial nurse visit when you're at the hospital: summarize your main issue, weight, height, recent changes, etc. I would not trust it when it comes to a detailed and technical back-and-forth with the doctor. I would think for compliance reasons hospitals would not want to alter the records and only go by transcripts, but what do I know...

Any recommendations for a technically competent person, but for someone with math knowledge trailing off at Calc 2?

Technical debt increase over the past few years is mind boggling to me.

First the microservices, then the fuckton of CI/CD dependencies, and now add the AI slop on top with MCPs running in the back. Every day is a field day for security researchers.

And where are all the new incredible products we were promised? Just goes to show that tools are just tools. No matter how much you throw at your product, if it sucks, it'll suck afterwards as well. Focus on the products, not the tools.

Me: 69

Webpage: "Nice'

---

Upvoted.

But seriously, this was really informative!