<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: zamadatix</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=zamadatix</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 16:50:03 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=zamadatix" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "Wit, unker, Git: The lost medieval pronouns of English intimacy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for sharing! That was a fantastic read.<p>For anyone not wanting to read through it all, the story in the conclusion of the chapter was a particularly good laugh:<p>> I have referred in a former chapter to the King's partiality for his dogs; one species of which is still celebrated among the fancy as King Charles's breed. On the occasion of an entry into Salisbury, an honest Cavalier pressed forward to see him, and came so near the coach that his Majesty cautioned the poor man not to cling too close to the door lest one of the little black spaniels in the coach should chance to bite him. The loyalist still persisting in being near, a spaniel seized him by the finger, and the sufferer cried with a loud voice, "God bless your Majesty, but G—d d—n your dogs!"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:21:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721812</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721812</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721812</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "New iPhone age and identity checks restrict internet freedom in the UK"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agree to disagree for the same reason the guidelines don't say anything about citing claims in comments: What you're looking for where claims are cited for a full background is provided, is not the only valid way to write something worthwhile on the internet.<p>You insist this piece should be in the form of a cited and fully explanatory journalistic article when writing such a blog post signals no such goal. The intent here is to alert for support, not to be a news source about the topic. Adding the news piece is great for the conversation here, it's just dunking on the post for not being that type of piece itself is overly dismissive.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:36:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721306</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721306</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721306</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "New iPhone age and identity checks restrict internet freedom in the UK"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've been thinking about true/false positives/negatives on this a lot lately and trying to see if there are any non-obvious signals in current AI/human text that impact those.<p>GP's comment doesn't seem to have any of the "obvious" signals most look for, would you be willing to share what signals you latched on to for this conclusion?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:03:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720163</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720163</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720163</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "Generative art over the years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure I manage to follow accurately. If you don't save the art you make then it's gone, generative or not. If you do save the output in some way (either by saving the output itself or saving the full information needed to regenerate the output) what is special about doing so on the blockchain vs anywhere else beyond the aforementioned proof of ownership?<p>One is of course allowed to care about proof of ownership and the method used to do so if they like :). I just didn't follow the response in context of the question of how it's different from doing the same without the blockchain otherwise.<p>Unrelated: Kickass you're the Monokai author - I still use that today! Have you ever posted a retrospective about Monokai?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:57:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720047</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720047</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "New iPhone age and identity checks restrict internet freedom in the UK"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It links to fca.org, gov.uk, and racfonudation.org. I think the goal of this page is activism rather than journalism though, and the donation links are a much more apt way for privacy activism funding than ads like on that news site.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 04:41:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713739</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713739</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713739</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "BunnyCDN has been silently losing our production files for 15 months"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe "the story" was intended to refer to the horror story in the main post rather than the minor issue described in the comment above.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 01:54:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712663</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712663</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712663</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "ChatGPT Pro now starts at $100/month"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That the inference would say these existing paid tiers should have already enshittified with the 2024 $200 Pro announcement is precisely why one does need to wait & see.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 23:27:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47711633</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47711633</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47711633</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "ChatGPT Pro now starts at $100/month"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But these are, again, additional tiers.<p>You can't just say because they've added more things the old things are over - the old things actually have to go away first. Eventually they may get there (or not). It may be another few years (or not). Nothing is actually now over though any more than it was now over in 2024.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 18:50:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707985</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707985</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707985</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "ChatGPT Pro now starts at $100/month"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The same could have been claimed in 2024 when they introduced the $200 Pro plan. Nothing is over yet just because of what could possibly happen next.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 18:45:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707888</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707888</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707888</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "ChatGPT Pro now starts at $100/month"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can you expand what you mean by "subsidization being over" in terms of the plan prices?<p>- Plus is still the same $20<p>- 20x Pro is still the same $200<p>- This is a new 5x tier is $100<p><a href="https://help.openai.com/en/articles/9793128-what-is-chatgpt-pro#:~:text=Who%20is%20the%20Pro%20plan%20for%3F" rel="nofollow">https://help.openai.com/en/articles/9793128-what-is-chatgpt-...</a> is probably a better direct comparison of the 3</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 18:39:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707794</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707794</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707794</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "They're made out of meat (1991)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Asking Gemini with the titles swapped will give you an equally confident story and reasoning about why "Bordered in Black" is actually preferred. This, and more, is why we're interested in what you have to say about the stories instead of what the LLM has to say.<p>What makes you a big fan of the story/reminded you of it here? I just gave it a re-read and thought it was alright. Not my favorite work of his... but certainly not bad either. Perhaps I've just read too many Sci-Fi stories to be properly shocked by the theme given the relatively short time to be immersed in the setting :).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:27:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702229</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702229</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702229</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's not really what GP was saying, but since you brought it up I think it would actually be insane NOT to - otherwise Bitcoin has an extremely unstable period as 100s of billions of $ worth of locked up BTC becomes instantly fluid the moment the non-QR wallets are crackable.<p>I.e. it makes sense to have a long term planned migration of what's active rather than any type of instantaneous rush/change.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 10:59:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702023</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702023</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702023</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I had a good chuckle going from Banksy on one line to whether the person is committing a crime on the other - that it's a crime was key to how the article claimed to find Banksy's identity and mentioned as one of the likely factors in why Banksy chose to be anonymous early on :D.<p>I get you mean whether they are causing any actual harm though (and agree for many such unmaskings), it was just an amusing juxtaposition of literal statements.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 10:51:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701970</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701970</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701970</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "LittleSnitch for Linux"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The allow rule for Firefox is what would suppress the prompt. You probably don't want to have a prompt for every Firefox connection though, so you'd need to come up with some kind of ruleset (or get very annoyed :D).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 10:04:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701513</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701513</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701513</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "LittleSnitch for Linux"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not necessarily (with Open Snitch at least), it just depends how complex you want to make your firewall rules and what the specific goal is (block this specific script, block scripts which try to do this activity, block connection to evil.net, block python scripts, etc).<p>The more granular one gets the more likely they aren't really meaning to ask how to do it in the firewall layer though. E.g. if we take it further to wanting to prevent python -c "specific logic" it's clearer what you can do in the firewall is not necessarily the same as what's practical or useful.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 09:43:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701370</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701370</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701370</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "LittleSnitch for Linux"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>With the literal rules described it would not be blocked. A more detailed rule (in Open Snitch at least, not as familiar with the other variants) could match e.g. whether the process's parent tree contained the python binary rather than just if python is the process binding the socket.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 09:28:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701267</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701267</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701267</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin's creator"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>At least Adam Back is already publicly known to be worth at least tens of millions anywyas. Many of those dozens/hundreds of other guesses are not so lucky.<p>If the private key still exists, the BTC would be worth more like 10s of billions though. I choose to believe the key is long gone from this world though, whoever originally had it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 04:52:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47699409</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47699409</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47699409</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "They're made out of meat (1991)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think they are abound in sarcasm :).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:26:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695822</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695822</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695822</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "Lunar Flyby"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In that case with the metadata I wonder if the astronauts already sent the raw files over the laser link and the images were just processed by the ground staff for posting on the site.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:49:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695376</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695376</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695376</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by zamadatix in "I ported Mac OS X to the Nintendo Wii"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Another funny history fact with the Wii is Windows Vista released the same month in North America. People were so upset that the minimum requirement for Vista said 512 MB (which was already more than the average existing home PC of the time had without an upgrade) but it ran like crap unless you had more.<p>We truly had to get away with less back then. These days it feels like there is a bit more headroom where 8 GB is on the downtrend, 16 GB is becoming the most common, and the user's apps are enjoying the extra fat.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:45:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695317</link><dc:creator>zamadatix</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695317</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695317</guid></item></channel></rss>