That's a "large" organization problem. But large is actually, not that big (about 5-10 scrum teams before this is a very large problem).

It also means on critical systems separating high risk and low risk changes are not possible.

Like all engineering decisions, this is a set of tradeoffs.

> Chinese workers work longer hours more happily and they’re physically faster with their hands; they can do things that American labor can’t. It’s years of accumulated skill, but it’s also a culture that is oriented around hard work and education that the United States no longer has. In China, there are no people who are too fat to work. The workers don’t storm off midshift, never to return to their job. You don’t have people who insist on being paid in cash so that they can keep their disability payments, while they do acrobatics on the factory floor that the non-disabled workers cannot do.

It's an actual joke to present something with such a derogatory view of the median American worker with no data to back it up. Most of America's "labor class" is in fact Mexican, the country with the highest annual hours worked per year. Secondly hours worked does not relate directly to productivity. American workers are the most productive in the world. [1]

More importantly, _we don't manufacture like this anymore, even in China_. Doing "acrobatics" on the factory floor is now obsolete. Much of what's said here fails to acknowledge that we would _not_ build our supply chains the same way as China does. China had a surplus of human labor (one that's facing an impending demographic crisis) and so used human labor in ways modern western countries would not and do not.[2]

[1] https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/01/the-countries-where-... [2] https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/global-robotics-race...

Reproducing these supply chains is more possible than this article states. Doing it via destroying our economy however will not work.

Now sometimes folks (the Windows team famously did this) build systems which identify which tests to run based on changes that occur in the codebase, but that's _not_ easy.

Agreed hybrid presents real opportunity.

Traditional codecs have always focused on trade offs among encode complexity, decode complexity, and latency. Where complexity = compute. If every target device ran a 4090 at full power, we could go far below 22kbps with a traditional codec techniques for content like this. 22kbps isn't particularly impressive given these compute constraints.

This is my field, and trust me we (MPEG committees, AOM) look at "AI" based models, including GANs constantly. They don't yet look promising compared to traditional methods.

Oh and benchmarking against a video compression standard that's over twenty years old isn't doing a lot either for the plausibility of these methods.

http://therisingsea.org/post/mast30026/

Has a good introduction to space, and the notion of a manifold, and what a Minkowski space is.

If you have more than 500k of assets in this form, you should have multiple funds and bank accounts.

Again, you need the collapse of the US currency if you are a) not exceptionally wealthy or b) not wealthy and incredibly financially uninformed.

That interest rates change is global.