words dont really matter all that much. people use them because it makes them sound like they know what it is, and if its important and complex, usually have no clue.

ive seen enough "abac" where the attribute is "your login name"

we need a few more bad incidents before they stop.

zero trust helped a lot because it forced vendors to stop relying on people magically doing the right thing ina centralized system. it decentralized boundaries.

this paper just says you still need deterministic boundaries and access control, not just have an llm say safe or unsafe. cool thanks google haha.

ps: hi guys, i know yall reading. sometimes its not the concept, its the implementation. else active shield or whatever would have worked too. not everyone can be the T7-9 thinker if implementing is seen as "for peasants"

- a lot of folks use ai poorly and innudate you with slop, reducing your own efficiency

- because you can just prompt it doesn't mean you should. many let the machine crank out tokens until it works, rather than thinking about the problem first.

of course, if AI solves my second point automatically, it'll solve the first as well, and we'll call that AGI. But we don't have that yet.

it's their pro that isn't awesome at all. in fact, their pro kinda suck now that everyone else woke up.

its billions, trillions were talking about.

imo hn should display posters origin, such as country, bon, datacenter registered ips, and the discourse will change dramatically.

im surprised dave is still there too. probably can't let it go...